Refining the Late Quaternary tephrochronology for southern South America using the Laguna Potrok Aike sedimentary record
Rebecca Elizabeth SmithVicki SmithKaren FontijnCatalina GebhardtStefan WastegårdBernd ZolitschkaChristian OhlendorfCharles R. SternChristoph Mayr
25
Citation
72
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
This paper presents a detailed record of volcanism extending back to ∼80 kyr BP for southern South America using the sediments of Laguna Potrok Aike (ICDP expedition 5022; Potrok Aike Maar Lake Sediment Archive Drilling Project - PASADO). Our analysis of tephra includes the morphology of glass, the mineral componentry, the abundance of glass-shards, lithics and minerals, and the composition of glass-shards in relation to the stratigraphy. Firstly, a reference database of glass compositions of known eruptions in the region was created to enable robust tephra correlations. This includes data published elsewhere, in addition to new glass-shard analyses of proximal tephra deposits from Hudson (eruption units H1 and H2), Aguilera (A1), Reclus (R1, R2-3), Mt Burney (MB1, MB2, MBx, MB1910) and historical Lautaro/Viedma deposits. The analysis of the ninety-four tephra layers observed in the Laguna Potrok Aike sedimentary sequence reveals that twenty-five tephra deposits in the record are the result of primary fallout and are sourced from at least three different volcanoes in the Austral Andean Volcanic Zone (Mt Burney, Reclus, Lautaro/Viedma) and one in the southernmost Southern Volcanic Zone (Hudson). One new correlation to the widespread H1 eruption from Hudson volcano at 8.7 (8.6–9.0) cal ka BP during the Quaternary is identified. The identification of sixty-five discrete deposits that were predominantly volcanic ashes (glass and minerals) with subtle characteristics of reworking (in addition to three likely reworked tephra, and one unknown layer) indicates that care must be taken in the analysis of both visible and invisible tephra layers to decipher their emplacement mechanisms.Keywords:
Tephrochronology
Maar
Volcanic glass
Tephrochronology
Maar
Varve
Chronology
Volcanic hazards
Cite
Citations (111)
Explosive volcanic eruptions generate plumes of hot gas and quenched molten rock that has been fragmented by the expansion of gas as the magma exits the vent. These fragments are called pyroclasts . The tephra layers are comprised of volcanic glass, crystals, and lithic material. Given that tephra is dispersed over wide areas and forms a geologically instantaneous layer, these tephra layers can be particularly useful for chronology – providing a relative chronology between sites and age if the eruption has been dated using radiometric methods. Correlating volcanic ash layers between sites and to specific eruption deposits preserved at their source volcanoes can be achieved using the composition of the volcanic glass shards. The major and trace element glass compositions remain the same for a specific eruption deposit irrespective of the distance from the vent, and they constitute the chemical fingerprint of the tephra. Volcanic deposits can be dated using many commonly employed radiometric dating methods.
Tephrochronology
Chronology
Volcanic ash
Peléan eruption
Volcanic glass
Radiometric dating
Volcanic hazards
Phreatomagmatic eruption
Vulcanian eruption
Cite
Citations (1)
Tephras, mainly from Iceland, are becoming increasingly important in interpreting leads and lags in the Holocene climate system across NW Europe. Here we demonstrate that Quantitative Phase Analysis of x-ray diffractograms of the <2 mm of marine sediment fraction (ie, sand, silt and clay) from Iceland and East Greenland can detect peaks in volcanic glass concentrations (weight%) even though discrete tephra layers are not visible; thus it provides a rapid overview of the probable location of volcanic glass within sediment sequences. Experiments in spiking samples from Baffin Bay and an artificial mixture of minerals with known weight% fractions of an Icelandic tephra (Hekla 4) demonstrate a significant correlation (r 2 =0.92 and 0.97) between known and estimated weight percentages, although the slope of the measured to observed weight% is around 0.65 and not 1.0 as expected. In core B997-321PC off North Iceland we identify tephras from point counting in the > 150 μm fraction and identify these same peaks in XRD scans two of these correlate geochemically and chronologically with Hekla 1104 and 3. At a distal site to the WNW of Iceland, on the East Greenland margin (core MD99-2317), the weight% of volcanic glass reaches values of 11% at about the time of the Saksunarvatn tephra. The XRD method identifies the presence of volcanic glass but not its elemental composition; hence it will assist in focusing attention on specific sections of sediment cores for subsequent geochemical fingerprinting of tephras.
Volcanic glass
Tephrochronology
Volcanic ash
Cite
Citations (23)
This paper presents a detailed record of volcanism extending back to ∼80 kyr BP for southern South America using the sediments of Laguna Potrok Aike (ICDP expedition 5022; Potrok Aike Maar Lake Sediment Archive Drilling Project - PASADO). Our analysis of tephra includes the morphology of glass, the mineral componentry, the abundance of glass-shards, lithics and minerals, and the composition of glass-shards in relation to the stratigraphy. Firstly, a reference database of glass compositions of known eruptions in the region was created to enable robust tephra correlations. This includes data published elsewhere, in addition to new glass-shard analyses of proximal tephra deposits from Hudson (eruption units H1 and H2), Aguilera (A1), Reclus (R1, R2-3), Mt Burney (MB1, MB2, MBx, MB1910) and historical Lautaro/Viedma deposits. The analysis of the ninety-four tephra layers observed in the Laguna Potrok Aike sedimentary sequence reveals that twenty-five tephra deposits in the record are the result of primary fallout and are sourced from at least three different volcanoes in the Austral Andean Volcanic Zone (Mt Burney, Reclus, Lautaro/Viedma) and one in the southernmost Southern Volcanic Zone (Hudson). One new correlation to the widespread H1 eruption from Hudson volcano at 8.7 (8.6–9.0) cal ka BP during the Quaternary is identified. The identification of sixty-five discrete deposits that were predominantly volcanic ashes (glass and minerals) with subtle characteristics of reworking (in addition to three likely reworked tephra, and one unknown layer) indicates that care must be taken in the analysis of both visible and invisible tephra layers to decipher their emplacement mechanisms.
Tephrochronology
Maar
Volcanic glass
Cite
Citations (25)
A continuous ∼5280 calendar (cal.) yr long cryptotephrostratigraphic record of a peat core from northern New Zealand demonstrates that cryptotephra studies can enhance conventional tephra records by extending the known distribution of ash fall and enabling re-assessment of volcanic hazards. A systematic sampling strategy was used to locate peaks in glass-shard concentrations and to determine loci of individual geochemical populations, and a palynological method involving spiking samples with Lycopodium spores was adapted to facilitate accurate counting of glass-shard concentrations. Using glass shard major element compositions, and a core chronology based on eight AMS 14 C ages and two visible macroscopic tephra layers, Taupo Tephra (Unit Y) (1688-1748 cal. BP) and Tuhua Tephra (6800-7230 cal. BP) (2cr-age ranges), four cryptotephras were correlated with known eruptions: Whakaipo (Unit V) (2743-2782 cal. BP), Stent (Unit Q) (4240-4510 cal. BP), and Unit K (4970-5290 cal. BP), erupted from Taupo Volcanic Centre, and Whakatane Tephra (5470-5600 cal. BP) erupted from Okataina Volcanic Centre. Mixed glass populations were found in the core, most likely an artefact of post-depositional remobilization of shards vertically (both up and down) in the peat or on its surface by wind, or a result of closely spaced eruption events, or a combination of these. A secondary glass population identified within the macroscopic Taupo Tephra was tentatively attributed to either an earlier phase within that eruption or to mixing with a slightly older Taupo-derived eruptive or (less likely) a currently unknown Okataina-derived eruptive. These results indicate that, in the absence of continuous cryptotephrostratigraphic analysis, a peak in shard concentrations may not in itself be indicative of the ‘true’ stratigraphic (ie, isochronous) level of a tephra layer. For cryptotephra studies of peat cores, we recommend (1) using a detailed sampling strategy for the analysis of distal tephra-derived glass to detect and account for any mixed populations and possible vertical spread of glass shards through the peat, and (2) analysing more shards from larger samples to help ‘capture’ sparsely represented cryptic andesitic tephra deposits.
Tephrochronology
Volcanic glass
Chronology
Volcanic hazards
Peléan eruption
Lapilli
Cite
Citations (84)
Tephrochronology
Microprobe
Volcanic glass
Cite
Citations (55)
Cryptotephrochronology, the use of hidden, diminutive volcanic ash layers to date sediments, has rarely been applied outside western Europe but has the potential to improve the tephrochronology of other regions of the world. Here we present the first comprehensive cryptotephra study in Alaska. Cores were extracted from five peatland sites, with cryptotephras located by ashing and microscopy and their glass geochemistry examined using electron probe microanalysis. Glass geochemical data from nine tephras were compared between sites and with data from previous Alaskan tephra studies. One tephra present in all the cores is believed to represent a previously unidentified eruption of Mt. Churchill and is named here as the ‘Lena tephra’. A mid-Holocene tephra in one site is very similar to Aniakchak tephra and most likely represents a previously unidentified Aniakchak eruption, ca. 5300–5030 cal yr BP. Other tephras are from the late Holocene White River eruption, a mid-Holocene Mt. Churchill eruption, and possibly eruptions of Redoubt and Augustine volcanoes. These results show the potential of cryptotephras to expand the geographic limits of tephrochronology and demonstrate that Mt. Churchill has been more active in the Holocene than previously appreciated. This finding may necessitate reassessment of volcanic hazards in the region.
Tephrochronology
Volcanic hazards
Volcanic glass
Cite
Citations (46)
Abstract Detailed tephrochronologies are built to underpin probabilistic volcanic hazard forecasting, and to understand the dynamics and history of diverse geomorphic, climatic, soil-forming and environmental processes. Complicating factors include highly variable tephra distribution over time; difficulty in correlating tephras from site to site based on physical and chemical properties; and uncertain age determinations. Multiple sites permit construction of more accurate composite tephra records, but correctly merging individual site records by recognizing common events and site-specific gaps is complex. We present an automated procedure for matching tephra sequences between multiple deposition sites using stochastic local optimization techniques. If individual tephra age determinations are not significantly different between sites, they are matched and a more precise age is assigned. Known stratigraphy and mineralogical or geochemical compositions are used to constrain tephra matches. We apply this method to match tephra records from five long sediment cores (≤ 75 cal ka BP) in Auckland, New Zealand. Sediments at these sites preserve basaltic tephras from local eruptions of the Auckland Volcanic Field as well as distal rhyolitic and andesitic tephras from Okataina, Taupo, Egmont, Tongariro, and Tuhua (Mayor Island) volcanic centers. The new correlated record compiled is statistically more likely than previously published arrangements from this area.
Maar
Tephrochronology
Volcanic hazards
Lapilli
Cite
Citations (22)
Large volcanic eruptions from Iceland can produce significant volumes of glass-rich rhyolitic tephra, which are then deposited across NW Europe and the North Atlantic-Arctic region, forming time-parallel marker horizons useful to palaeoenvironmental studies. Here we investigate new ways of improving the tephrochronological record of Iceland using (thermo)luminescence analysis of rhyolitic volcanic glass shards that dominate airfall ash deposits of the Þórsmörk Ignimbrite (ÞIG), tephra from the Askja 1875 AD, Öræfi 1362 AD eruptions, and the Óþoli tephra from NW Iceland. Following screening experiments, which showed that pure volcanic glass samples retained age-related TL signals, we undertook glass-phase TL dating of the ÞIG and Óþoli tephra. Our TL age estimate of c. 40 ± 10 ka for the ÞIG supports the phenocryst-based radiometric age of c. 50 ka rather than older age estimates of c. 200 ka. Results from the Óþoli tephra were consistent with the fission track age established at c. 2 Ma age, but further investigations of high dose sensitivity changes and longer-term stability factors such as athermal fading are required for quantitative dating of volcanic glass deposits >100 ka. However, as thermoluminescence signals from purified glass fractions of Icelandic tephra can be obtained over 100–1,000,000-year time scales, luminescence characterisation of glass shards can be used alongside geochemical and morphological analysis to distinguish between distal tephras with similar geochemical signatures, and assist with tephrochronological investigations beyond the limits of radiocarbon dating.
Volcanic glass
Tephrochronology
Phenocryst
Thermoluminescence dating
Volcanic hazards
Volcanic ash
Lapilli
Cite
Citations (0)