A new high‐precision40Ar/39Ar age for the Rochechouart impact structure: At least 5 Ma older than the Triassic–Jurassic boundary
25
Citation
53
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Abstract The Rochechourt impact structure in south‐central France, with maximum diameter of 40–50 km, has previously been dated to within 1% uncertainty of the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, at which time ~30% of global genera became extinct. To evaluate the temporal relationship between the impact and the Triassic–Jurassic boundary at high precision, we have re‐examined the structure's age using multicollector ARGUS ‐V 40 Ar/ 39 Ar mass spectrometry. Results from four aliquots of impact melt are highly reproducible, and yield an age of 206.92 ± 0.20/0.32 Ma (2σ, full analytical/external uncertainties). Thus, the Rochechouart impact structure predates the Triassic–Jurassic boundary by 5.6 ± 0.4 Ma and so is not temporally linked to the mass extinction. Rochechouart has formerly been proposed to be part of a multiple impact event, but when compared with new ages from the other purported “paired” structures, the results provide no evidence for synchronous impacts in the Late Triassic. The widespread Central Atlantic Magmatic Province flood basalts remain the most likely cause of the Triassic–Jurassic mass extinction.Keywords:
Flood basalt
Impact structure
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Abstract The Rochechourt impact structure in south‐central France, with maximum diameter of 40–50 km, has previously been dated to within 1% uncertainty of the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, at which time ~30% of global genera became extinct. To evaluate the temporal relationship between the impact and the Triassic–Jurassic boundary at high precision, we have re‐examined the structure's age using multicollector ARGUS ‐V 40 Ar/ 39 Ar mass spectrometry. Results from four aliquots of impact melt are highly reproducible, and yield an age of 206.92 ± 0.20/0.32 Ma (2σ, full analytical/external uncertainties). Thus, the Rochechouart impact structure predates the Triassic–Jurassic boundary by 5.6 ± 0.4 Ma and so is not temporally linked to the mass extinction. Rochechouart has formerly been proposed to be part of a multiple impact event, but when compared with new ages from the other purported “paired” structures, the results provide no evidence for synchronous impacts in the Late Triassic. The widespread Central Atlantic Magmatic Province flood basalts remain the most likely cause of the Triassic–Jurassic mass extinction.
Flood basalt
Impact structure
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Cite
Citations (25)
Flood basalt
Permian–Triassic extinction event
Deccan Traps
Large igneous province
Cite
Citations (126)
The five major mass extinctions identified in 1982 by Raup and Sepkoski have expanded to six, with the suggestion that the Permian-Triassic extinction was a double event. Is there a general explanation for great mass extinctions, or can they result from different triggers, or even from internal system instabilities? The two most-discussed candidates for a general extinction mechanism are impacts and flood-basalt eruptions. A compilation of evidence for impact at the times of mass extinctions shows that this cause is abundantly confirmed in the case of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction and the late Eocene, which is a time of minor and gradual extinction, but little or no evidence connects other major extinctions to impact. On the other hand, there is a remarkable time correlation between flood basalts and four major extinctions, but no other evidence that flood basalts cause mass extinctions. The evidence for an impact-extinction linkage is strikingly different from that for a connection between flood basalts and extinctions. Flood basalts cover larger areas than craters and their associated thick ejecta blankets, which are thus less likely to be found. Impacts distribute proxies globally at instantaneous time horizons, whereas flood-basalt events are extended in time, and no remote proxies have been recognized. Many global killing mechanisms have been proposed in the case of impacts, but few have been suggested for flood basalts. It is possible that flood basalts are triggered by impact, but it is not obvious how impacts could result from anything other than chance. The hypothesis that impacts are the general cause of mass extinctions has not received supporting evidence, but has not been falsified. The hypothesis that flood basalts are the general cause of mass extinctions is supported by evidence from timing, but is not susceptible to falsification. Other candidates for general extinction causes, especially sea-level changes and system instabilities, would require separate treatment. The question is still very much open.
Flood basalt
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Permian–Triassic extinction event
Cite
Citations (61)
The two mass extinction events in the Permian, debated and investigated by geologists, have been a hottest of issues. In the Permo—Triassic boundary (PTB, about 252 Ma) mass extinction, more than 90% of marine species went extinct, and biogeochemical cycles were disrupted globally. The other smaller mass extinction occurred at the Guadalupian—Lopingian boundary (GLB, end-Guadalupian, about 260 Ma). Although the origin of the two mass extinction events has been unclear, it is a coincidence that a temporal link between the two mass extinction events and flood basalts volcanisms of the Siberian and Emeishan large igneous provinces. Generally,the volcanism has been considered to be a major cause of mass extinction which caused a sharp deterioration of global climate due to a large quantity of volatile gases and volcanic ash production. This paper reviews, around the coupling relationship between the two mass extinction events and the large igneous provinces, research results of volatile gases release from geological processes associated with large igneous provinces. In the end, we summarize some controversies at the current stage and put forward some suggestions for Emeishan large igneous province.
Large igneous province
Flood basalt
Permian–Triassic extinction event
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Cite
Citations (3)
Flood basalt
Large igneous province
Permian–Triassic extinction event
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Cite
Citations (570)
Refinements of the geological timescale driven by the increasing precision and accuracy of radiometric dating have revealed an apparent correlation between large igneous provinces (LIPs) and intervals of Phanerozoic faunal turnover that has been much discussed at a qualitative level. However, the extent to which such correlations are likely to occur by chance has yet to be quantitatively tested, and other kill mechanisms have been suggested for many mass extinctions. Here, we show that the degree of temporal correlation between continental LIPs and faunal turnover in the Phanerozoic is unlikely to occur by chance, suggesting a causal relationship linking extinctions and continental flood basalts. The relationship is stronger for LIPs with higher estimated eruptive rates and for stage boundaries with higher extinction magnitudes. This suggests LIP magma degassing as a primary kill mechanism for mass extinctions and other intervals of faunal turnover, which may be related to CO 2 , SO 2
Flood basalt
Cite
Citations (29)
Deccan volcanism, one of Earth's largest flood basalt provinces, erupted ~80% of its total volume (phase 2) during a relatively short time in the uppermost Maastrichtian paleomagnetic chron C29r and ended with the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary mass extinction. Full biotic recovery in the marine realm was delayed at least 500 k.y. or until after the last Deccan eruptions in C29n (phase 3, 14% of the total Deccan volume). For over 30 yr, the mass extinction has been commonly attributed to the Chicxulub impact, and the delayed recovery remained an enigma. Here, we demonstrate that the two phases of Deccan volcanism can account for both the mass extinction and delayed marine recovery.
Flood basalt
Deccan Traps
Magnetostratigraphy
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Cite
Citations (81)
Flood basalt
Large igneous province
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Cite
Citations (1,149)
The temporal link between mass extinctions and large igneous provinces is well known. Here, we examine this link by focusing on the potential climatic effects of large igneous province eruptions during several extinction crises that show the best correlation with mass volcanism: the Frasnian-Famennian (Late Devonian), Capitanian (Middle Permian), end-Permian, end-Triassic, and Toarcian (Early Jurassic) extinctions. It is clear that there is no direct correlation between total volume of lava and extinction magnitude because there is always sufficient recovery time between individual eruptions to negate any cumulative effect of successive flood basalt eruptions. Instead, the environmental and climatic damage must...
Flood basalt
Large igneous province
Late Devonian extinction
Devonian
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Permian–Triassic extinction event
Cite
Citations (292)
Flood basalt
Deccan Traps
Extinction (optical mineralogy)
Crater lake
Cite
Citations (12)