The Central Mineral Belt (CMB) in Labrador, Canada, hosts multiple U (±base ± precious metal) showings, prospects and deposits in metamorphosed and variably hydrothermally altered Neoarchean to Mesoproterozoic, igneous and sedimentary rocks. Previous work has recognized U mineralization locally associated with Fe-Ca and alkali metasomatism typical of metasomatic iron oxide and alkali-calcic alteration systems (IOAA) that host iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and affiliated critical metal deposits. However, the type, extent and temporal or genetic relationships between the diverse Fe, Ca and alkali metasomatism and the regionally distributed U mineralization remains poorly understood. Combined unsupervised machine-learning and classification of alteration from a large geochemical dataset distinguish the main alteration phases in the CMB, identify compositional changes related to U mineralization, and infer lithological/mineralogical information from samples with censored (i.e., missing), limited and/or inaccurate metadata. Weak to intense Na and Na + Ca-Fe (Mg) metasomatism in the southwest (Two-Time and Moran Lake areas) and eastern (Michelin area) portions of the CMB pre-dates U mineralization and Fe-oxide breccia development, similar to albitite-hosted U and IOCG deposits globally. Rare earth elements and spider diagrams highlight both preservation and disruption of normally immobile elements. Principal component and cluster analysis indicate significant variations in Fe-Mg ± Na contents in the rocks from combinations of Na, Ca, Fe, and Mg-rich alteration, while protolith REE signatures can be locally preserved even after pervasive albitization-hematization. Cluster analysis identifies mineralized felsic and mafic rocks in the Michelin deposit and Moran Lake area, facilitating inference of relevant lithological/mineralogical information from samples lacking or with limited meta-data. The methods outlined provide rapid and relatively inexpensive means to optimize identification of mineral systems within large geochemical datasets, verify drill core or field observations, highlight potentially overlooked alteration, and refine economic mineral potential assessments. Based on our results and previous work, we suggest the mineral potential of the southwestern and eastern CMB needs to be re-assessed with modern exploration models for IOAA ore systems and their iron oxide-poor variants.
Combined sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) and thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) UPb zircon data from a tightly constrained stratigraphic context of the Wakeham Group provide a precise depositional age for sedimentation within this extensive basin of the Grenville Province. Metavolcanic rocks at the eastern exposure of the Wakeham Group yield ages of 1511 ± 13, 1506 ± 11, 1502 ± 9, and 1491 ± 7 Ma. A crosscutting 1493 ± 10 Ma porphyry vein marks the end of volcanism. The older two volcanic rocks rest stratigraphically above metasediments, with a 1517 ± 20 Ma maximum age of sedimentation derived from the youngest detrital zircons of an arenite. Five 1.611.55 Ga inherited zircons in the volcanics, reinforced by coeval inheritance in nearby plutons, indicate a Labradorian basement source to the supracrustals. The predominant arenite detrital zircons dates are in the 1.951.75 Ga range, however, and feature both trace element and morphological evidence for metamorphism in the source terrane. Together with zircons as old as 2.95 Ga, the detrital age spectrum is consistent with a circum-Superior provenance. The ages obtained imply that Wakeham Group volcanism and sedimentation were, at least in part, coeval with the onset of 1.521.46 Ga Pinwarian plutonism along the southeastern margin of Laurentia. UPb zircon analyses record a late Grenvillian metamorphic event around 1019 Ma. UPb monazite analyses from one sample yield 10101000 Ma ages, and the end of Grenvillian metamorphism is marked by 990 Ma UPb titanite ages.
Abstract Achieving net-zero carbon emissions goals will increasingly rely on critical mineral resources while simultaneously decreasing the extraction, processing and use of hydrocarbons as the primary provider of energy. Canada is well positioned to contribute to this effort through a series of innovative policy and research initiatives, and it is Canada's goal to be a stable supplier of critical minerals into the future. To this end, Natural Resources Canada and the Geological Survey of Canada invest financial resources into critical mineral research initiatives. This research aims to generate precompetitive baseline geological, geochemical and geophysical data for large, underexplored regions within Canada, whereas targeted studies focus on mineral systems science and improved exploration models for the large variety of critical mineral resources distributed throughout Canada. These research approaches can be combined, digitally, to generate mineral potential models. These ongoing efforts by the Geological Survey of Canada enhance the viability of Canada being (or maintaining its status as) a hub for critical mineral resource development and processing well into the future.
The Paleoproterozoic East Arm Basin of Canada hosts polymetallic vein, iron oxide–apatite (IOA), and potential iron oxide–copper–gold (IOCG) mineral occurrences, mainly associated with a belt of ca. 1.87 Ga intermediate-composition sills termed the Compton intrusions. Advances in our knowledge of the East Arm Basin and of IOA and IOCG deposits within the broader context of iron oxide and alkali-calcic alteration systems enables a new regional analysis of this mineralization and facilitates comparison of these mineral occurrences and host rocks to the nearby Great Bear magmatic zone IOCG districts. The Compton intrusions and co-magmatic Pearson Formation volcanic rocks are comparable in age and composition to intrusive plus volcanic rocks of the Great Bear magmatic zone that host IOA–IOCG mineralization. Taking into account fault displacements, emplacement of Compton intrusions and Pearson Formation volcanic rocks are also consistent with the architecture of modern arcs, supporting a direct relationship with the Great Bear subduction zone. Trace element patterns of uraninite contained in IOA occurrences of the East Arm Basin are also similar to the patterns of uraninite from the Great Bear magmatic zone occurrences, consistent with both regions having experienced similar iron oxide and alkali-calcic alteration and mineralization. Our new results indicate that exploration for IOA, IOCG, and affiliated deposits in the East Arm Basin should focus on delineating increased potassic-iron alteration types and fault/breccia zones associated with these systems through field mapping and application of geochemical, radiometric, magnetic, and gravity surveys.
