The environment project in the greater Mekong sub-region was the largest multi-field environmental cooperation launched by six countries (China, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Cambodia) in 2006, since the cooperation mechanism was established by Asian Development Bank (ADB) in 1992. How to establish the indicators to assess the achievements of the biological corridor construction and the status of ecological environment quantitatively is one of the prerequisites for the future project ongoing phase. The popular Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework was employed in this study to assess the natural and human pressure, the healthy state of regional natural environment, and the subsequent response of ecosystem dynamic change in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Instead of using surveying based data as driving parameters, large amount of driving factors were retrieved from multi-source remote sensing data from 2000 to 2017, which provides access to larger updated and real-time databases, more tangible data allowing more objective goal management, and better spatially covered. The driving factors for pressure analysis included digital elevation, land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, light index, road network map, land cover dynamic change and land use degree, which were derived directly and indirectly from remote sensing. The indicators for state evaluation were composed of vegetation index, leaf area index, and fractional vegetation cover from remote sensing directly. The comprehensive response index was mainly determined by the pressure and state indicators. Through the analysis based on an overlay technique, it showed that the ecological environment deteriorated firstly from 2000 to 2010 and then started to improve from 2010 to 2017. The proofs indicated that the natural forest and wetland ecosystems were improved and the farmland area was decreased between 2000 and 2017. This study explored effective indicators from remote sensing for the ecological and environmental assessment, which can provide a strong decision-making basis for promoting the sustainable development of the ecological environment in the greater Mekong subregion, as well as the technological support for the construction of the biodiversity corridor.
Albedo characterizes the radiometric interface of land surfaces, especially vegetation, and the atmosphere. Albedo is a critical input to many models, such as crop growth models, hydrological models and climate models. For the extensive attention to crop monitoring, a physical albedo model for crops is developed based on the law of energy conservation and spectral invariants, which is derived from a prior forest albedo model. The model inputs have been efficiently and physically parameterized, including the dependency of albedo on the solar zenith/azimuth angle, the fraction of diffuse skylight in the incident radiance, the canopy structure, the leaf reflectance/transmittance and the soil reflectance characteristics. Both the anisotropy of soil reflectance and the clumping effect of crop leaves at the canopy scale are considered, which contribute to the improvement of the model accuracy. The comparison between the model results and Monte Carlo simulation results indicates that the canopy albedo has high accuracy with an RMSE < 0.005. The validation using ground measurements has also demonstrated the reliability of the model and that it can reflect the interaction mechanism between radiation and the canopy-soil system.
As a surface component, the tree trunk affects the top-of-canopy (TOC) emissivity and thermal infrared (TIR) radiance over a forest with fewer leaves, which is important for the inversion of land surface temperatures (LSTs) and further applications such as predicting forest fires and monitoring drought conditions. Therefore, the tree trunk effect was analyzed in this article using a thermal radiation directionality model, in which the forest structure was considered by the geometric optical (GO) theory and the spectral invariance theory was introduced into the GO framework for the single-scattering effect between components. The model used was evaluated using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based measurements with root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) lower than 0.25 °C for directional anisotropies (DAs) of brightness temperatures (BTs). Comparison with a 3-D radiative transfer model, discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART), also indicated an acceptable tool of the proposed model for the trunk effect with RMSEs lower than 0.003 °C and 1.2 °C for DAs of emissivity and BTs, respectively. In this study, the root-mean-squared difference (RMSD) levels between the vegetation-soil and vegetation-trunk-soil canopies, which were viewed as an equivalent indicator of the trunk effect, were provided for the TOC emissivity and BTs as well as their DAs, by combination with the changes in the leaf area index (LAI), stand density, trunk shape, and component temperatures, which can help identify the cases in which the trunk effect should be considered. According to a comprehensive analysis, for cases with sparse stand density ( α <; 0.04 ), the tree trunk should be considered for a BT RMSD level lower than 0.5 °C when the LAI value was lower than 0.6. The corresponding LAI value was 0.8 for an RMSD level of BT DA lower than 0.3 °C. Moreover, for the cases with low soil emissivity, the difference in the TOC emissivity with and without trunk can reach up to 0.035, and the RMSD was still larger than 0.01 when the stand density and LAI were 0.05 and 0.6, respectively.
The academician Xiaowen Li devoted much of his life to pursuing fundamental research in remote sensing. A pioneer in the geometric-optical modeling of vegetation canopies, his work is held in high regard by the international remote sensing community. He codeveloped the Li–Strahler geometric-optic model, and this paper was selected by a member of the International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) milestone series. As a chief scientist, Xiaowen Li led a scientific team that made outstanding advances in bidirectional reflectance distribution modeling, directional thermal emission modeling, comprehensive experiments, and the understanding of spatial and temporal scale effects in remote sensing information, and of quantitative inversions utilizing remote sensing data. In addition to his broad research activities, he was noted for his humility and his dedication in making science more accessible for the general public. Here, the life and academic contributions of Xiaowen Li to the field of quantitative remote sensing science are briefly reviewed.
In recent years, China has developed and launched several satellites with high spatial resolutions, such as the resources satellite No. 3 (ZY-3) with a multi-spectral camera (MUX) and 5.8 m spatial resolution, the satellite GaoFen No. 1 (GF-1) with a wide field of view (WFV) camera and 16 m spatial resolution, and the environment satellite (HJ-1A/B) with a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and 30 m spatial resolution. First, to analyze the potential application of ZY-3 MUX, GF-1 WFV, and HJ-1 CCD to extract the leaf area index (LAI) at the regional scale, this study estimated LAI from the relationships between physical model-based spectral vegetation indices (SVIs) and LAI values that were generated from look-up tables (LUTs), simulated from the combination of the PROSPECT-5B leaf model and the scattering by arbitrarily inclined leaves with the hot-spot effect (SAILH) canopy reflectance model. Second, to assess the surface reflectance quality of these sensors after data preprocessing, the well-processed surface reflectance products of the Landsat-8 operational land imager (OLI) sensor with a convincing data quality were used to compare the performances of ZY-3 MUX, GF-1 WFV, and HJ-1 CCD sensors both in theory and reality. Apart from several reflectance fluctuations, the reflectance trends were coincident, and the reflectance values of the red and near-infrared (NIR) bands were comparable among these sensors. Finally, to analyze the accuracy of the LAI estimated from ZY-3 MUX, GF-1 WFV, and HJ-1 CCD, the LAI estimations from these sensors were validated based on LAI field measurements in Huailai, Hebei Province, China. The results showed that the performance of the LAI that was inversed from ZY-3 MUX was better than that from GF-1 WFV, and HJ-1 CCD, both of which tended to be systematically underestimated. In addition, the value ranges and accuracies of the LAI inversions both decreased with decreasing spatial resolution.
The clumping index (CI) is a canopy structure parameter that describes the dispersion or grouping of leaves. Previously, it has been estimated based on the normalized difference between hotspot and darkspot (NDHD), which is derived from multi-angle remote sensing data. However, currently it is impossible to derive CI from NDHD for a large area at a spatial resolution finer than 275 m since such fine multi-angle data are unavailable. In this study, an algorithm of the mixed-pixel clumping index (MPCI) was implemented, and an MPCI map of China's landmass at 1 km resolution was derived from the HJ-1A/1B data at 30 m resolution. The MPCI map was compared with the previous NDHD CI derived from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). The correlation of these two datasets was greater than 0.9, and the mean bias was approximately 0.1. Indirectly, the MPCI map was applied to an effective leaf area index (LAI) product to derive true LAI. Using the MODIS LAI product as a reference, we found that the coefficient of determination was improved from 0.72 to 0.80, and the root mean squared error was reduced from 0.53 to 0.35 m 2 /m 2 after the effective LAI is corrected by this MPCI map, suggesting that this MPCI map is comparable to the NDHD CI. Although our algorithm is currently tested at 1 km resolution, potentially, it can be applied to higher spatial resolution than 275 m for mapping LAI and carbon cycle modeling before these multi-angle data at higher resolution are available.
Downward surface solar radiation (DSSR) plays an important role in the earth's surface energy budget. However, it has significant spatial-temporal heterogeneity over the rugged terrain. To accurately capture DSSR, many analytical terrain parameter algorithms based on digital elevation models (DEMs) have been proposed. However, the uncertainties of the DSSR components associated with these algorithms remain unclear. In this letter, we compared three types of terrain parameter algorithms and their respective DSSR component uncertainties at different spatial scales by using 3-D discrete anisotropic radiative model simulations under different atmospheric conditions. The comparison results indicated that differences in slopes, sky view factors, and terrain view factors can be up to 4°, 0.165°, and 0.264°, respectively. For a high atmospheric visibility, the maximum discrepancies of direct solar irradiance and adjacent terrain-reflected irradiance over the high reflective surface (e.g., fresh snow and ice) are 26.7 and 42.8 W·m 2 , respectively. In addition, for a low atmospheric visibility, a maximum difference of 31 W·m 2 is identified for diffuse skylight. These uncertainties are nonnegligible when using a high-resolution DEM (e.g., 30 m), but as the DEM resolution becomes coarser, the uncertainties decrease.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)