An evaluation of the Arctic clouds and surface radiative fluxes in CMIP6 models

There is direct evidence that excess net radiation calculated in general circulation models at continental surfaces [of about 11–17 W m−2 (20%–27%) on an annual basis is not only due to overestimates in annual incoming shortwave fluxes [of 9–18 W m−2 (6%–9%)], but also to underestimates in outgoing longwave fluxes. The bias in the outgoing longwave flux is deduced from a comparison of screen-air temperature observations, available as a global climatology of mean monthly values, and model-calculated surface and screen-air temperatures. An underestimate in the screen temperature computed in general circulation models over continents, of about 3 K on an annual basis, implies an underestimate in the outgoing longwave flux, averaged in six models under study, of 11–15 W m−2 (3%–4%). For a set of 22 inland stations studied previously, the residual bias on an annual basis (the residual is the net radiation minus incoming shortwave plus outgoing longwave) varies between 18 and −23 W m−2 for the models considered. Additional biases in one or both of the reflected shortwave and incoming longwave components cannot be ruled out.

Longwave

Shortwave

Shortwave radiation

Outgoing longwave radiation

10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<1360:osagst>2.0.co;2

Cite

Citations (20)

Horizontal profiles of longwave and shortwave radiation, temperature, humidity, and photographs at Barrow, Alaska, observations on day 9, 2011-06-13

Stephen R. Hudson Mats A. Granskog Tor Ivan Karlsen Kristen Fossan

Longwave

Shortwave radiation

Shortwave