Fossil seamount in southeast Zagros records intraoceanic arc to back-arc transition: New constraints for the evolution of the Neotethys
Guillaume BonnetPhilippe AgardHubert WhitechurchMarc FournierSamuel AngiboustBenoît CaronJafar Omrani
26
Citation
179
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Forearc
Seamount
Passive margin
Back-arc basin
Island arc
Abstract The well-characterized Sierra Nevada magmatic arc offers an unparalleled opportunity to improve our understanding of continental arc magmatism, but present bedrock exposure provides an incomplete record that is dominated by Cretaceous plutons, making it challenging to decipher details of older magmatism and the dynamic interplay between plutonism and volcanism. Moreover, the forearc detrital record includes abundant zircon formed during apparent magmatic lulls, suggesting that understanding the long-term history of arc magmatism requires integrating plutonic, volcanic, and detrital records. We present trace-element geochemistry of detrital zircon grains from the Great Valley forearc basin to survey Sierra Nevadan arc magmatism through Mesozoic time. We analyzed 257 previously dated detrital zircon grains from seven sandstone samples of volcanogenic, arkosic, and mixed compositions deposited ca. 145–80 Ma along the length of the forearc basin. Detrital zircon trace-element geochemistry is largely consistent with continental arc derivation and shows similar geochemical ranges between samples, regardless of location along strike of the forearc basin, depositional age, or sandstone composition. Comparison of zircon trace-element data from the forearc, arc, and retroarc regions revealed geochemical asymmetry across the arc that was persistent through time and demonstrated that forearc and retroarc basins sampled different parts of the arc and therefore recorded different magmatic histories. In addition, we identified a minor group of Jurassic detrital zircon grains with oceanic geochemical signatures that may have provenance in the Coast Range ophiolite. Taken together, these results suggest that the forearc detrital zircon data set reveals information different from that gleaned from the arc itself and that zircon compositions can help to identify and differentiate geochemically distinct parts of continental arc systems. Our results highlight the importance of integrating multiple proxies to fully document arc magmatism, demonstrating that detrital zircon geochemical data can enhance understanding of a well-characterized arc, and these data may prove an effective means by which to survey an arc that is inaccessible and therefore poorly characterized.
Forearc
Back-arc basin
Continental arc
Trace element
Cite
Citations (16)
Summary Recent results of ocean dredging of ophiolitic rocks in forearc areas in the west Pacific region are summarized and discussed together with the field data in the ophiolitic belts in the Setogawa and Mineoka forearc belts in central Japan. Metamorphism, deformation and sedimentation of the dismembered ophiolites in these regions indicate that they were emplaced at first in transform-fault areas or oceanic fracture zones, and they became the subsequent zones of initiation of subduction. Sometimes the mass of dismembered ophiolite was tectonically and sedimentarily mixed with island-arc materials and incorporated into the forearc belts during subsequent forearc tectonics.
Forearc
Island arc
Cite
Citations (22)
The SW Ecuador‐NW Peru forearc region is the southernmost location, where the Caribbean large igneous province (CLIP) interacted with the South American margin since the Late Cretaceous. The accretion of the CLIP to the margin led to the entrapment of the North Andean crustal Sliver, conforming the underlying basement of the forearc region in Ecuador, whereas in NW Peru, forearc depocenters involve rocks of continental affinity. Many existing tectonic reconstructions have treated these two areas independently, largely based on their crustal affinities. In contrast, this study integrates previous studies into an analysis of unpublished seismic profiles, potential field data, outcrop stratigraphy, and recent studies dealing with the dynamics of allochthonous terrane accretion along continental margins. Our integrated approach shows that SW Ecuador was dominated by a Late Cretaceous deforming outer wedge, which may have constituted a remnant of a northeast or northwest dipping obliquely obducted oceanic block at the edge of the CLIP. This tectonic phase was governed by plate instability, affecting NW Peru and SW Ecuador, followed by reestablishment of the margin by early Eocene. The resulting margin configuration and the spatial distribution of the different tectonic elements seem to have played a key role in the further Cenozoic development of the forearc region. The model presented in this study proposes that the accretion of buoyant oceanic terranes may have had a profound impact on the early margin configuration of SW Ecuador and NW Peru and led to the development of localized but genetically related forearc depocenters.
Forearc
Passive margin
Continental Margin
Accretionary wedge
Basement
Escarpment
Cite
Citations (3)
The southern Urals of Russia contain a well‐preserved example of a Paleozoic arc‐continent collision in which the intraoceanic Magnitogorsk volcanic arc and its forearc basin sediments accreted to the East European Craton during the Devonian. The Magnitogorsk arc records the evolution from incipient intraoceanic subduction to a mature arc, and by comparing its surface geological features with those in active arc‐continent collision settings it is possible to identify upper crustal processes that were active in the southern Urals. The arc edifice can be divided into western and eastern volcanic fronts that were active during different stages of arc evolution and for which two distinct phases of forearc basin development can be recognized. The late Lower to Middle Devonian Aktau Formation represents a remnant of the intraoceanic to collisional forearc basin to the Irendyk volcanic front, whereas the Middle Devonian to Lower Carboniferous Ulutau, Koltubanian, and Zilair Formations were deposited in a suture forearc basin to the east Magnitogorsk volcanic front. It was not until the Late Devonian that these two basins were joined. Structural mapping, combined with reflection seismic profiling, shows these basins to be affected by open, nonlinear, volcanic basement‐cored synsedimentary folds. The Karamalytash anticline appears to have the geometry of a growth fold that formed during deposition of sediments in the suture forearc basin. The forearc region is affected by minor thrusting that involves the volcanic basement, although it is not clear if these thrusts reactivate preexisting trench‐parallel faults. Synsedimentary deformation, slumping, and olistostrome development were common throughout the suture forearc basin history but were especially widespread during the Late Devonian, when the full thickness of the continental crust is interpreted as having arrived at the subduction zone.
Forearc
Volcanic arc
Island arc
Devonian
Basement
Cite
Citations (52)
Forearc
Back-arc basin
Tourmaline
Linkage (software)
Cite
Citations (0)
Forearc
Siliciclastic
Felsic
Passive margin
Volcanic arc
Continental arc
Continental Margin
Cite
Citations (54)
Samples dredged from the forearc west of the Mariana Trench include boninite and island-arc tholeiite series volcanic rocks. These are part of a late Eocene–early Oligocene arc complex that forms most of the forearc basement; the complex has been exposed by tectonic erosion. The boninites are depleted in TiO2 (0.20%), Y (5–9 ppm), and heavy rare-earth elements (YbN = 2.4), and have low Ti/Zr and Y/Zr ratios. They are variously enriched in alkali metals, alkaline earths, and light rare-earth elements. These boninitic samples, in common with other such suites, appear to be hydrous melts of a once-melted peridotitic...
Forearc
Petrogenesis
Volcanic arc
Island arc
Rare-earth element
Basement
Cite
Citations (27)
The Central Eastern Desert (CED) is characterized by the widespread distribution of Neoproterozoic intra-oceanic island arc ophiolitic assemblages. The ophiolitic units have both back-arc and forearc geochemical signatures. The forearc ophiolitic units lie to the west of the back-arc related ones, indicating formation of an intra-oceanic island arc system above an east-dipping subducted slab (present coordinates). Following final accretion of the Neoproterozoic island arc into the western Saharan Metacraton, cordilleran margin magmatism started above a new W-dipping subduction zone due to a plate polarity reversal. We identify two belts in the CED representing ancient arc–forearc and arc–back-arc assemblages. The western arc–forearc belt is delineated by major serpentinite bodies running ∼NNW–SSE, marking a suture zone. Ophiolitic units in the back-arc belt to the east show an increase in the subduction geochemical signature from north to south, culminating in the occurrence of bimodal volcanic rocks farther south. This progression in subduction magmatism resulted from diachronous opening of a back-arc basin from north to south, with a bimodal volcanic arc evolving farther to the south. The intra-oceanic island arc units in the CED include coeval Algoma-type banded iron formations (BIFs) and volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits. Formation of the BIFs was related to opening of an ocean basin to the north, whereas development of the VMS was related to rifting of the island arc in the south. Gold occurs as vein-type mineral deposits, concentrated along the NNW–SSE arc–forearc belt. The formation of these vein-type gold ore bodies was controlled by the circulation of hydrothermal fluids through serpentinites that resulted in Au mobilization, as constrained by the close spatial association of auriferous quartz veins with serpentinites along the western arc–forearc belt.
Forearc
Back-arc basin
Island arc
Volcanic arc
Diachronous
Cite
Citations (62)
Forearc
Back-arc basin
Passive margin
Cite
Citations (1)