logo
    Drought constraints on transpiration and canopy conductance in mature aspen and jack pine stands
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2006)
    Pierre Y. BernierPaul BartlettT. Andrew BlackAlan BarrNatascha KljunJ. H. McCaughey
    58
    Citation
    46
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Keywords:
    Canopy conductance
    Stomatal Conductance
    Growing season
    Biometeorology
    Topics:
    Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
    Tree-ring climate responses
    Forest ecology and management
    Assessment of effective LAI and water use efficiency using Eddy Covariance data
    The Science of The Total Environment (2021)
    Mazda KompanizareRichard M. PetroneMerrin L. MacraeKevin De HaanMyroslava Khomik
    Stomatal Conductance
    Water Use Efficiency
    Canopy conductance
    Water use
    Citations (6)
    Toward biologically meaningful net carbon exchange estimates for tall, dense canopies: Multi-level eddy covariance observations and canopy coupling regimes in a mature Douglas-fir forest in Oregon
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2013)
    Christoph ThomasJonathan G. MartinB. E. LawKent Davis
    Biometeorology
    Ecosystem respiration
    Tree canopy
    Soil respiration
    Citations (90)
    A canopy conductance model with temporal physiological and environmental factors
    The Science of The Total Environment (2021)
    Jiaming XuBingfang WuDongryeol RyuNana YanWeiwei Zhu
    Canopy conductance
    Stomatal Conductance
    Photosynthetically active radiation
    Citations (22)
    Modeling canopy conductance under contrasting seasonal conditions for a tropical savanna ecosystem of south central Mato Grosso, Brazil
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2016)
    Thiago Rangel RodriguesGeorge L. VourlitisFrancisco de Almeida LoboF. B. SantannaPaulo Henrique Zanella de Arruda
    Canopy conductance
    Tropical savanna climate
    Dry season
    Citations (41)
    Calculating canopy stomatal conductance from eddy covariance measurements, in light of the energy budget closure problem
    Biogeosciences (2021)
    Richard WehrS. R. Saleska
    Abstract. Canopy stomatal conductance is commonly estimated from eddy covariance measurements of the latent heat flux (LE) by inverting the Penman–Monteith equation. That method ignores eddy covariance measurements of the sensible heat flux (H) and instead calculates H implicitly as the residual of all other terms in the site energy budget. Here we show that canopy stomatal conductance is more accurately calculated from eddy covariance (EC) measurements of both H and LE using the flux–gradient equations that define conductance and underlie the Penman–Monteith equation, especially when the site energy budget fails to close due to pervasive biases in the eddy fluxes and/or the available energy. The flux–gradient formulation dispenses with unnecessary assumptions, is conceptually simpler, and is as or more accurate in all plausible scenarios. The inverted Penman–Monteith equation, on the other hand, contributes substantial biases and erroneous spatial and temporal patterns to canopy stomatal conductance, skewing its relationships with drivers such as light and vapor pressure deficit.
    Canopy conductance
    Stomatal Conductance
    Energy budget
    Penman–Monteith equation
    Citations (29)
    Quantifying plant transpiration and canopy conductance using eddy flux data: An underlying water use efficiency method
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2019)
    Yan BaiXiaoyan LiSha ZhouXiaofan YangKailiang Yu
    Canopy conductance
    Lysimeter
    Stomatal Conductance
    Water Use Efficiency
    Growing season
    Citations (42)