Age of the Irkut block of the Prisayan uplift of the Siberian platform basement: Dating minerals from metamorphic rocks
9
Citation
11
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Migmatite
Basement
Sillimanite
The southernmost Hidaka metamorphic belt consists mainly of cordierite tonalite intrusions and pelitic metamorphic rocks ranging from the greenschist to the granulite facies. Anatectic migmatites are common in the higher amphibolite and granulite facies zones. Compositional changes in major, rare earth elements and some other trace metals are so small that they are undetectable among the pelitic metamorphic rocks of zones A + B + C and D, but they are large enough to be detected in the higher amphibolite (zone D) to the granulite facies rocks (zone E). The enrichment of Fe, Mg, Na, Eu, and Sc, and the depletion of K, P, La, Ce, Nd, Cs and Rb are statistically significant in pelitic granulites, while heavy REEs are very variable. The chemical variation of pelitic granulite was derived from the accumulation of plagioclase + garnet. This suggests that more than 50-60% of the total volume of pelitic granulite was melted to produce a large amount of tonalitic magma, leaving pelitic granulite as a restite. Migmatites of the higher amphibolite facies are anatexites, and their K, P, Cs, Rb and light REE content is the same as that of lower grade metamorphic rocks. Migmatites of the higher amphibolite facies melted incipiently to segregate only a small amount of melt, and could not produce a large magmatic mass such as the cordierite tonalites. Cordierite tonalites are S-type granites, and their major elements, Cs, Rb and light REE concentrations are similar to those of lower grade metamorphic rocks. The chemical variation of cordierite tonalites is explained by the extraction of plagioclase + garnet from a tonalitic magma and the variation of original sedimentary rocks. The small chemical difference between the cordierite tonalites and the lower grade metamorphic rocks suggests that the former was derived from a massive melting of metapelites or that much of the restite is retained. The material migration among higher amphibolite facies rocks, pelitic granulites, migmatites and cordierite tonalites took place through mineral/melt interaction in the lower crust.
Migmatite
Anatexis
Pelite
Cordierite
Greenschist
Sillimanite
Cite
Citations (14)
Suprasolidus continental crust is prone to loss and redistribution of anatectic melt to shallow crustal levels. These processes ultimately lead to differentiation of the continental crust. The majority of granulite facies rocks worldwide has experienced melt loss and the reintegration of melt is becoming an increasingly popular approach to reconstruct the prograde history of melt-depleted rocks by means of phase equilibria modelling. It involves the stepwise down-temperature reintegration of a certain amount of melt into the residual bulk composition along an inferred P–T path, and various ways of calculating and reintegrating melt compositions have been developed and applied. Here different melt-reintegration approaches are tested using El Hoyazo granulitic enclaves (SE Spain), and Mt. Stafford residual migmatites (central Australia). Various sets of P–T pseudosections were constructed progressing step by step, to lower temperatures along the inferred P–T paths. Melt-reintegration was done following one-step and multi-step procedures proposed in the literature. For El Hoyazo granulites, modelling was also performed reintegrating the measured melt inclusions and matrix glass compositions and considering the melt amounts inferred by mass-balance calculations. The overall topology of phase diagrams is pretty similar, suggesting that, in spite of the different methods adopted, reintegrating a certain amount of melt can be sufficient to reconstruct a plausible prograde history (i.e., melting conditions and reactions, and melt productivity) of residual migmatites and granulites. However, significant underestimations of melt productivity may occur and have to be taken into account when a melt-reintegration approach is applied to highly residual (SiO2 < 55 wt.%) rocks, or to rocks for which H2O retention from subsolidus conditions is high (such as in the case of rapid crustal melting triggered by mafic magma underplating).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Migmatite
Cite
Citations (0)
Migmatite
Cite
Citations (4)
Sillimanite
Cite
Citations (7)
Overprinting
Sillimanite
Cordierite
Cite
Citations (7)
Sillimanite
Pegmatite
Pyroxene
Cite
Citations (3)
Important advances have been made during the last 15 years in the study of melt inclusions in minerals from migmatites and granulites.Pioneer work on high temperature metapelitic anatectic enclaves in peraluminous dacites from SE Spain has shown that droplets of granitic melt can be trapped by minerals growing during incongruent melting reactions, and that the composition of such trapped melts can be representative of that of the bulk melt in the system during the anatexis of the rock.Therefore melt inclusions may represent samples of embryionic anatectic granite.In most cases, these melt inclusions define microstructures that are typical of primary entrapment, and show little or no evidence of melt crystallization upon cooling.Rather, the melt solidified to glass due to very fast cooling associated with the submarine extrusion of the dacites.Hence inclusions can readily be analyzed for major and trace elements by conventional methods such as the electron microprobe or by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry.Based on the results from these quite unusual anatectic enclaves, one would expect similar melt inclusions to be present also in more conventional, slowly cooled, regionally metamorphosed migmatite and granulite terranes.As a matter of fact, recent investigations confirm this hypothesis.Tiny (<25 μm) inclusions containing a cryptocrystalline aggregate of quartz, feldpars, biotite and muscovite have been found in garnet from the metapelitic granulites of the Keraka Khondalite Belt, as well as in garnet and ilmenite from metapelitic and quartzo-feldspathic migmatites from the Alps, Ronda and the Himalayas.Due to the grain-size, texture and chemical/mineralogical composition, these inclusions are called "nanogranites" and are interpreted to represent a crystallized inclusion of anatectic melt.Exceptionally and spatially associated with the nanogranites, inclusions containing glass have also been observed.In general, the preparation of the samples and analysis of these inclusions in migmatites and granulites require more sophisticated techniques than those applied to inclusions in xenoliths and enclaves, but the information on the composition of crustal anatectic melts can also be obtained.Since its discovery, new occurrences of nanogranite are being reported, or can be inferred from re-assessment of literature data, from migmatites and granulites worldwide.These former melt inclusions open new perspectives both for the microstructural approach to partially melted rocks and for the chemical characterization of natural crustal melts.
Migmatite
Melt inclusions
Cite
Citations (69)
Migmatite
Sillimanite
Cordierite
Andalusite
Cite
Citations (20)
Migmatite
Charnockite
Cite
Citations (20)
ABSTRACT Suprasolidus continental crust is prone to loss and redistribution of anatectic melt to shallow crustal levels. These processes ultimately lead to differentiation of the continental crust. The majority of granulite facies rocks worldwide has experienced melt loss and the reintegration of melt is becoming an increasingly popular approach to reconstruct the prograde history of melt‐depleted rocks by means of phase equilibria modelling. It involves the stepwise down‐temperature reintegration of a certain amount of melt into the residual bulk composition along an inferred P–T path, and various ways of calculating and reintegrating melt compositions have been developed and applied. Here different melt‐reintegration approaches are tested using El Hoyazo granulitic enclaves (SE Spain), and Mt. Stafford residual migmatites (central Australia). Various sets of P–T pseudosections were constructed progressing step by step, to lower temperatures along the inferred P–T paths. Melt‐reintegration was done following one‐step and multi‐step procedures proposed in the literature. For El Hoyazo granulites, modelling was also performed reintegrating the measured melt inclusions and matrix glass compositions and considering the melt amounts inferred by mass–balance calculations. The overall topology of phase diagrams is pretty similar, suggesting that, in spite of the different methods adopted, reintegrating a certain amount of melt can be sufficient to reconstruct a plausible prograde history (i.e. melting conditions and reactions, and melt productivity) of residual migmatites and granulites. However, significant underestimations of melt productivity may occur and have to be taken into account when a melt‐reintegration approach is applied to highly residual (SiO 2 <55 wt%) rocks, or to rocks for which H 2 O retention from subsolidus conditions is high (such as in the case of rapid crustal melting triggered by mafic magma underplating).
Migmatite
Cite
Citations (73)