The extraction of nickel (Ni) from sulfide resources commences with flotation to produce a concentrate which is then smelted to produce a nickel-enriched phase called matte, and further refined to produce pure Ni products as well as by-products, such as cobalt (Co), copper (Cu) and precious metals. However, the traditional concentrate smelting-matte refining process, whilst technologically robust, is capital intensive and suffers from several environmental and technical issues such as sulfur dioxide emissions, poor recovery of cobalt and difficulty processing concentrates high in magnesia and arsenic without appropriate blending with high grade concentrates to dilute the concentration of these species. The direct hydrometallurgical processing of nickel sulfide concentrates and whole ores may be a remedy to these issues and hydrometallurgy offers several advantages over pyrometallurgy such as potentially lower capital costs, the ability to process lower grade materials and produce marketable metals or compounds directly from ore/concentrate. Despite the advantages of hydrometallurgy over traditional base metal sulfide smelting, the hydrometallurgical processing of nickel concentrates has been limited to a small handful of commercial operations, some of which only produce an upgraded intermediate for pyrometallurgical processing. In Part I of this three-part series, a comprehensive review of piloted processes for direct hydrometallurgical processing of nickel sulfide concentrates is presented, followed by a survey of industrial operations which have carried out direct leaching of nickel sulfide concentrates. A review of research activities and challenges/opportunities in the direct hydrometallurgical processing of nickel sulfide concentrates are presented in Part II and Part III of this series.
The following review is the second part of a series concerned with the direct hydrometallurgical processing of nickel sulfide flotation concentrates. In the first part of this series, piloted leaching processes and commercial nickel sulfide operations which employed direct hydrometallurgical processing were comprehensively reviewed. In Part II of this series, laboratory investigations into the pressure leaching of nickeliferous sulfide concentrates are critically analyzed. From this review, it is apparent that sulfuric acid pressure leaching processes have received the most attention relative to other lixiviant systems such as ammonia/ammonium, chloride, and nitric acid. This is likely due to the numerous technical advantages sulfate-based leaching systems offers relative to other lixiviants. Laboratory investigations into atmospheric concentrate leaching processes are explored in Part III of this series.
The following review is Part III of a series concerned with the direct hydrometallurgical processing of nickel sulfide flotation concentrates. In the first part of this series, piloted leaching processes and commercial nickel sulfide operations that employed direct hydrometallurgical processing were comprehensively reviewed. In the second part of this series, laboratory investigations into pressure leaching of nickel sulfide concentrates were critically analyzed. In Part III of this series, laboratory investigations into the leaching of nickeliferous sulfide concentrates at ambient pressure are reviewed, and the challenges and research opportunities in the direct leaching of nickel sulfide flotation concentrates are summarized. The majority of the published studies on atmospheric leaching of nickel sulfide flotation concentrates have focused on leaching in chloride media due to the faster leaching kinetics in chloride lixiviants relative to sulfate media; bioleaching due to the perceived environmental advantages over other leaching systems; and pyrometallurgical pre-treatments to render refractory sulfide minerals more amenable to subsequent leaching.