In many cases, when governments commit themselves to green policy targets, they also imply the development of 'green' industries to reach those targets. But, how do governments foster the development of such industries? This is particularly relevant because such industries are often in a very early stage of their evolution. Taking the case of organic farming, we argue that the state's ability to foster 'policy capacity' is critical to the emerging development trajectories of such industries. Focussing on the state's ability to generate policy capacity in the Danish and Australian organic food sector, this article suggests that policy capacity develops as a result of high levels of state and associative capacity and the ability to create conditions favourable for corporatist deliberation. The comparative study undertaken demonstrates that these conditions are met in the Danish case, resulting in a high level of policy capacity. By contrast, Australia suffers from a low level of policy capacity as a result of low state and associative capacity and lack of corporatist deliberation.
In this special issue, we aim to reflect on the first 21 years of research published in the Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning (JEPP), consisting of over 600 research articles and ninetee...
Promoting organic farming is the ultimate strategy to reduce the use of synthetic pesticides. Denmark and Sweden have introduced measures to increase organic consumption as a policy strategy to expand the organic farm sector. Both countries have introduced public procurement programmes for organic food in public sector institutions. While the Danish procurement programme relied on a set of central government policy instruments, the Swedish programme used a national organic consumption goal for the public sector as the main measure. In a Nordic context, both programmes were successful as they reached significantly higher organic consumption levels than those of the other Nordic countries. However, the Swedish procurement programme performed better than the Danish. The article undertakes a comparative analysis of the governance modes in the two programmes. These developed differently. In Denmark, governance was characterised by centrally governed programme initiatives whereas the Swedish governance mode limited the role of central government to setting direction and leaving it to local and regional government to adopt specific measures. The comparative analysis does not allow drawing firm conclusions about the effect of governance modes on programme success as the institutional context was most conducive for success in Sweden. Nonetheless, the analysis does highlight that the Swedish governance mode resulted in a high level of local engagement in increasing organic food procurement. Despite the differences, the cases suggest two pathways for successfully increasing public procurement of organic food as a measure to expand pesticide-free farming.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
