ABSTRACT Locally relevant scenarios of daily weather variables that represent the best knowledge of the present climate and projections of future climate change are needed by planners and managers to inform management and adaptation to climate change decisions. Information of this kind for the future is only readily available for a few developed country regions of the world. For many less‐developed regions, it is often difficult to find series of observed daily weather data to assist in planning decisions. This study applies a previously developed single‐site weather generator ( WG ) to the Caribbean, using examples from Belize in the west to Barbados in the east. The purpose of this development is to provide users in the region with generated sequences of possible future daily weather that they can use in a number of impact sectors. The WG is first calibrated for a number of sites across the region and the goodness of fit of the WG against the daily station observations assessed. Particular attention is focussed on the ability of the precipitation component of the WG to generate realistic extreme values for the calibration or control period. The WG is then modified using change factors ( CFs ) derived from regional climate model projections (control and future) to simulate future 30‐year scenarios centred on the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s. Changes between the control period and the three futures are illustrated not just by changes in average temperatures and precipitation amounts but also by a number of well‐used measures of extremes (very warm days/nights, the heaviest 5‐day precipitation total in a month, counts of the number of precipitation events above specific thresholds and the number of consecutive dry days).
Abstract. While engineers have been quantifying rainfall-runoff processes since the mid-19th century, it is only in the last decade that artificial neural network models have been applied to the same task. This paper evaluates two neural networks in this context: the popular multilayer perceptron (MLP), and the radial basis function network (RBF). Using six-hourly rainfall-runoff data for the River Yangtze at Yichang (upstream of the Three Gorges Dam) for the period 1991 to 1993, it is shown that both neural network types can simulate river flows beyond the range of the training set. In addition, an evaluation of alternative RBF transfer functions demonstrates that the popular Gaussian function, often used in RBF networks, is not necessarily the ‘best’ function to use for river flow forecasting. Comparisons are also made between these neural networks and conventional statistical techniques; stepwise multiple linear regression, auto regressive moving average models and a zero order forecasting approach. Keywords: Artificial neural network, multilayer perception, radial basis function, flood forecasting
ABSTRACT Weather typing, based on surface pressure charts, has been one of the principal means of analysis in synoptic climatology. Here, we use an automated scheme to derive weather types ( WTs ) and also calculate Lamb weather types ( LWTs ) for the Falkland Islands. The WTs are based on sea‐level pressure data estimated using two reanalysis products: one that extends from 1948 to 2014 and another that just uses station pressure data as input and extends back to 1871. The WTs can be used to derive counts of gale days and these will be compared with storminess estimates based on the rate of change of daily‐average pressure measurements at the principal observational site (near the capital, Port Stanley) on the islands. A particular emphasis of the paper is the reliability of the results taking into account that we are using reanalysis datasets from a very data‐sparse region of the world. More gale days are estimated during the period from about 1880 to the mid‐1910s and since the 1980s. Fewer gale days are evident during other periods, particularly from the mid‐1910s to 1947. As these changes are not evident in the storminess measure derived from the sub‐daily pressure series for the Port Stanley region, the results in terms of gale‐day counts are very suggestive of being due to differences in the quality of the reanalysis during the different periods. The reanalysis appears better the higher the number of gale days estimated. The opening of the Panama Canal in 1914 dramatically reduced the number of ships, and hence observations, rounding Cape Horn. The paper also relates seasonal counts of the LWTs and WTs to recently developed long series of temperature and precipitation for the Port Stanley region.
Abstract Instrumental temperature data for the Northern Hemisphere (30°–90°N) clearly indicate that winter season variability is larger than equivalent measures for summer. This should not be surprising as temperatures in winter are dominated by variability caused by changes in atmospheric circulation features, whereas in summer variability is more dominated by local changes in cloudiness. Here we consider most of the few winter‐responding annually resolved proxy reconstructions of temperature from the northern North Atlantic and northwestern European regions. We find the expected out‐of‐phase relationship between northwest Europe and Greenland due to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which is stronger when the series from the two locations are formed from more than one series. On 30 year time scales this relationship between the two locations shows no century‐scale variations since 1250 CE (Common Era), the start of our reconstructions, in contrast to the strong positive NAO values before 1400 CE implied by the study of Trouet et al. (2009).
This study is an extensive revision of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) land station temperature database that has been used to produce a grid‐box data set of 5° latitude × 5° longitude temperature anomalies. The new database (CRUTEM4) comprises 5583 station records of which 4842 have enough data for the 1961–1990 period to calculate or estimate the average temperatures for this period. Many station records have had their data replaced by newly homogenized series that have been produced by a number of studies, particularly from National Meteorological Services (NMSs). Hemispheric temperature averages for land areas developed with the new CRUTEM4 data set differ slightly from their CRUTEM3 equivalent. The inclusion of much additional data from the Arctic (particularly the Russian Arctic) has led to estimates for the Northern Hemisphere (NH) being warmer by about 0.1°C for the years since 2001. The NH/Southern Hemisphere (SH) warms by 1.12°C/0.84°C over the period 1901–2010. The robustness of the hemispheric averages is assessed by producing five different analyses, each including a different subset of 20% of the station time series and by omitting some large countries. CRUTEM4 is also compared with hemispheric averages produced by reanalyses undertaken by the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF): ERA‐40 (1958–2001) and ERA‐Interim (1979–2010) data sets. For the NH, agreement is good back to 1958 and excellent from 1979 at monthly, annual, and decadal time scales. For the SH, agreement is poorer, but if the area is restricted to the SH north of 60°S, the agreement is dramatically improved from the mid‐1970s.