Experience and results from the Danish groundwater monitoring programme that has been carried out systematically since 1990, have been used in a co-operative project between Latvia and Denmark. The main objective of the project was to obtain more detailed knowledge of the shallow Latvian groundwater, to optimise the Latvian groundwater monitoring programme and to support the implementation of European legislation such as the Water Framework Directive, the Nitrate Directive and the Groundwater Directive in Latvia. Comprehensive summaries describing the methodology of groundwater quality monitoring as well as the major results from the Danish groundwater monitoring network can be found in GEUS (2005) and Stockmarr (2005). Until recently only few data on Latvian groundwater quality were available, but in a project running from 2003 to 2006, 800 samples from groundwater, springs and drains have been analysed for a large number of components resulting in a comprehensive overview of the status of Latvian groundwater (Fig. 1; Gosk et al. 2006). The project Agricultural influence on groundwater in Latvia was carried out by the State Geological Survey of Latvia and the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) and was supported by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency within the framework of the DANCEE programme (Danish Co-operation for Environment in Eastern Europe). As a spin-off of the project this paper compares groundwater quality in the two countries.
Abstract The major share of raw materials needed to sustain our present lifestyle and even more importantly, required for the crucial green transition, are sourced outside Europe. The European Commission aims to enhance Europe's resilience and strengthen domestic sourcing. Although Europe has a long tradition of mining and extractive activities, it is acknowledged that there are several challenges to achieve European sourcing of certain raw materials such as the critical raw materials. A basic prerequisite to enable access to domestic raw materials is information on raw material occurrences, current and past mining activities, resources and reserves. The Geological Survey organizations (GSOs) of Europe play a key role in generating, compiling, gathering and storing the most up-to-date information as well as long-term data series on raw materials at national and regional levels. Over the last decade, the GSOs have joined forces and taken essential steps to harmonize and share data on raw materials. The results of this co-operation are illustrated as interactive maps on the European Geological Data Infrastructure (EGDI). This paper describes the data compiled in co-operation between the GSOs, and analyses the strengths and weaknesses of, as well as opportunities for and threats towards, the data.
The naturally occurring geogenic elements iodine (I), lithium (Li), and strontium (Sr) have a beneficial effect on human health. Iodine has an essential role in human metabolism while Li and Sr are used, respectively, as a treatment for various mental disorders and for post-menopausal osteoporosis. The aim here is to evaluate the potential for future epidemiological investigations in Denmark of lifelong and chronic exposure to low doses of these compounds. The drinking water data represents approximately 45% of the annual Danish groundwater abstraction for drinking water purposes, which supplies approximately 2.5 million persons. The spatial patterns were studied using inverse distance weighted interpolation and cluster analysis. The exposed population was estimated based on two datasets: (1) population density in the smallest census unit, the parishes, and (2) geocoded addresses where at least one person is residing. We found significant spatial variation in the exposure for all three elements, related mainly to geochemical processes. This suggests a prospective opportunity for future epidemiological investigation of long-term effects of I, Li, and Sr, either alone or in combinations with other geogenic elements such as Ca, Mg or F.
This paper assesses how various sources of uncertainty propagate through the uncertainty cascade from emission scenarios through climate models and hydrological models to impacts, with a particular focus on groundwater aspects from a number of coordinated studies in Denmark. Our results are similar to those from surface water studies showing that climate model uncertainty dominates the results for projections of climate change impacts on streamflow and groundwater heads. However, we found uncertainties related to geological conceptualization and hydrological model discretization to be dominant for projections of well field capture zones, while the climate model uncertainty here is of minor importance. How to reduce the uncertainties on climate change impact projections related to groundwater is discussed, with an emphasis on the potential for reducing climate model biases through the use of fully coupled climate–hydrology models.Editor D. Koutsoyiannis; Associate editor not assigned
