<p>Normal faults are often complex three-dimensional structures comprising multiple sub-parallel segments separated by intact or breached relay zones. In this study we outline geometrical characterisations capturing this 3D complexity and providing a semi-quantitative basis for the comparison of faults and for defining the factors controlling their geometrical evolution. Relay zones are classified according to whether they step in the strike or dip direction and whether the relay zone-bounding fault segments are unconnected in 3D or bifurcate from a single surface. Complex fault surface geometry is then described in terms of the relative numbers of different types of relay zones to allow comparison of fault geometry between different faults and different geological settings. A large database of 87 fault arrays compiled primarily from mapping 3D seismic reflection surveys and classified according to this scheme, reveals the diversity of 3D fault geometry. Analysis demonstrates that mapped fault geometries depend on geological controls, primarily the heterogeneity of the faulted sequence and the presence of a pre-existing structure. For example, relay zones with an upward bifurcating geometry are prevalent in faults that reactivate deeper structures, whereas the formation of laterally bifurcating relays is promoted by heterogeneous mechanical stratigraphy. In addition, mapped segmentation depends on resolution limits and biases in fault mapping from seismic data. In particular, the results suggest that the proportion of bifurcating relay zones increases as data resolution increases. Overall, where a significant number of relay zones are mapped on a single fault, a wide variety of relay zone geometries occurs, demonstrating that individual faults can comprise segments that are both bifurcating and unconnected in three dimensions. Models for the geometrical evolution of fault arrays must therefore account for the full range of relay zone geometries that appears to be a characteristic of all faults.</p>
<p>This study uses a combination of 2D and 3D seismic reflection surveys coupled with borehole data from the Irish Atlantic margin to map the distribution of salt in the Slyne and Erris basins and understand its influence on basin development throughout the Mesozoic.</p><p>The north-western European Atlantic margin is populated by a framework of rift basins stretching from the Barents Sea offshore northern Norway to the south of Portugal. Several of these basins contain significant quantities of salt, which plays an important role in basin development and structural evolution. While salt is present on the Irish Atlantic margin, its distribution and role in basin development is poorly understood. The Slyne and Erris basins, off the northern coast of Ireland, contain two proven layers of salt; the Upper Permian Zechstein Group and the Upper Triassic Uilleann Halite Member of the Currach Formation.</p><p>Where present in their salt-dominated forms, both layers act as d&#233;collements, mechanically detaching pre-, intra- and post-salt stratigraphy. The Zechstein Group is present throughout the Slyne and Erris basins, while the Uilleann Halite Member is only developed in the northern Slyne Basin and the southern Erris Basin. Both salt layers have undergone significant halokinesis during basin development, and their original thicknesses are unclear. This halokinesis has played a significant role in the formation of hydrocarbon traps in these basins: the Zechstein Group forms salt pillows and salt rollers, causing folding and rafting in the overlying Mesozoic section, driven by active faulting in the pre-salt Palaeozoic basement. The Uilleann Halite Member caused thin-skinned crestal collapse and delamination of the overlying Jurassic section above anticlines cored by Zechstein salt. Both layers of salt play a key role in the development of the Corrib gas field and are responsible for trap formation in the Corrib North and Bandon discoveries. Understanding the genesis of these salt-related structures in a multi-layered salt system will provide insight into future exploration activities in salt-prone basins offshore Ireland, as well as their suitability for storage of sequestered CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>ICRAG is funded in part by a research grant from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant Number 13/RC/2092 and is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund and by PIPCO RSG and its member companies.</p>
The standard outcrop description of fault zones currently in vogue is a high strain fault core containing fault rock surrounded by a low strain halo termed a damage zone. This description does not acknowledge the significance of fault segmentation or displacement partitioning within fault zones and therefore fails to capture features which are crucial for defining the flow charateristics of faults. This terminology derives from outcrop studies but it is limited in it's ability to describe faults in 3D. Outcrop studies can best contribute towards an understanding of fault zones if they are set in the context of an appropriate 3D appreciation of faults, including quantitative definition of internal displacements and strain. Fault terminology should be guided by those datasets where 3D fault zone structure can be deciphered rather than by what is convenient in outcrops where it cannot. We suggest that the damage zone/fault core description promotes not only a simplified view of faults, but also a misleading one which is an obstacle to understanding them.
Summary Faults in reservoirs can act as both conduits and barriers to fluid flow. Fault seal arises due to a number of mechanisms including, juxtaposition of permeable and impermeable lithologies, fault cementation, and the production of low permeability fault rock by deformation of host beds. This presentation focuses on the production of low permeability fault rock by shale smear. The aim of this investigation was to gain a representative sample of the smearing behaviours of siltstone beds within the Mount Messenger Formation, a poorly lithified unit with a maximum burial depth of 1.5 km. Siltstone beds appear to be incorporated into fault zones by two end-member mechanisms; smearing and meso-scale synthetic faulting. Thin sections of these smears show that they are often deformed by brittle micro-faulting which is generally sub-parallel to the fault zone. Similarly, meso-scale faulting is most often characterized by multiple synthetic slip surfaces that displace the host beds across the fault zone. We suggest that shearing and incorporation of siltstone beds into fault zones is primarily a brittle process. This distinction is important for fault seal as it is more likely to produce variable silt source bed thicknesses within fault zones.