Popocatépetl is one of the most active volcanoes in North America. Its current predominantly mild activity is contrasted by a history of large effusive and explosive eruptions and sector collapse events, first summarized by Espinasa-Pereña and Martín-Del Pozzo (2006). Since then, a wealth of new radiometric, geophysical and volcanological data have been published, requiring a re-evaluation of the evolution of the Popocatépetl Volcanic Complex (PVC). We combined existing literature data with new field observations, aerial imagery and digital elevation model interpretations to produce an updated and improved reconstruction of the growth and evolution of the PVC throughout its history. This will be fundamental for the assessment and mitigation of risks associated with potential future high-magnitude activity of the PVC. The PVC consists of four successive volcanic edifices separated by three sector collapse events producing avalanche deposits: Tlamacas (>538–>330 ka, described here for the first time); Nexpayantla ( c. 330 to >98 ka); Ventorrillo ( c. 98–23.5 ka); and Popocatépetl (<23.5 ka). The newly described Tlamacas collapse propagated towards the ENE, forming part of the Mayorazgo avalanche deposit. Supplementary material: Supplementary files 1–7 are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5709190
The Calera cave system in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, with a large Pleistocene megafaunal assemblage is described. Hundreds of fossil bones have been found throughout the 1324 m of mapped galleries. The fossils are well preserved resulting from partial permineralization by manganese oxide. A preliminary taxonomic identification of the recovered specimens indicates Equus sp. is the most abundant taxon. Other groups include mammoths, gomphotheres, cervids, bovids, camelids, sloths, glyptodonts, felids, canids, lagomorphs, and testudines. It has been estimated that the cave would have started to form between 1.17 and 0.29 Ma. Since the fossils are found on top of or form part of the fluvial sedimentary deposits inside the cave passages, fossil deposition is much younger and probably occurred during the latest stage of cave formation and the fauna represents a time-averaged accumulation. A few specimens are covered with secondary calcite incrustations. The locality described in this study stands out because it contains one of the largest Pleistocene megafaunal assemblages of the region.
Andesite petrogenesis is inextricably linked to plate processing at convergent margins. The details of andesite formation, however, remain poorly understood because the signatures of the initial arc mantle melts are often modified in the overlying crust. To distinguish initial mantle from crustal signatures in arc magmas, we studied two compositionally zoned Holocene monogenetic volcanoes, Texcal Flow and Volcan Chichinautzin, in the central Mexican Volcanic Belt (MVB). Texcal Flow and V. Chichinautzin erupt 'ocean island basalt (OIB)-type', high-Nb (17–36 ppm), olivine-phyric basalts to basaltic andesites (49·4–57·3 wt % SiO2; Mg# = 68–50) that show an arc affinity in their major element oxides. At both volcanoes melt SiO2 increases with time. However, systematic changes of melt SiO2 with 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd, the overall low 87Sr/86Sr = 0·70305–0·70453 and high 143Nd/144Nd = 0·51273–0·51299 relative to continental crust, and the high 3He/4He = 7–8 Ra of olivine phenocrysts preclude melt silica enrichment by crustal assimilation and fractional crystallization. Instead, the data require the existence of silicic initial mantle melts. The high Ni abundances of olivines suggest that the silicic melts originate from segregations of 'reaction pyroxenites' that formed in the peridotite mantle wedge following multiple infiltrations of silicic slab components. Sequential melting of zoned silica-deficient to silica-excess pyroxenites can reproduce the time-progressive evolution of melt silica content at Texcal Flow and V. Chichinautzin. As initial melts always have high Mg# > 70 regardless of their SiO2 content, the low-Mg# values of the magmas erupted must reflect loss of moderate amounts (<15%) of olivine and possibly pyroxenes at crustal levels. Fractional crystallization and recharge mixing nearly erase all mantle signatures in the most silicic V. Chichinautzin magmas, so that their origin can only be inferred from their association with the more mafic precursory melts. The pyroxenite model implies that ∼15–18 wt % of the erupted melt mass, and possibly more, is slab-derived. We infer that the elements Fe, Mg, Ca and Ti are principally mantle-derived, whereas significant amounts of the elements Si, K, Na, P and possibly Al may be contributed from slab. As blends of mantle and slab materials, the OIB-type Texcal Flow and V. Chichinautzin magmas provide limited indication of the composition of the sub-arc mantle prior to subduction modification, which is inferred to be similar to primitive mantle, but less enriched than the sources of the intraplate magmas behind the MVB volcanic front.
During July 10th–11th 2015, Volcán de Colima, Mexico, underwent its most intense eruptive phase since its Subplinian–Plinian 1913 AD eruption. Production of scoria coincident with elevated fumarolic activity and SO2 flux indicate a significant switch of upper-conduit dynamics compared with the preceding decades of dome building and vulcanian explosions. A marked increase in rockfall events and degassing activity was observed on the 8th and 9th of July. On the 10th at 20:16 h (Local time = UTM − 6 h) a partial collapse of the dome generated a series of pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) that lasted 52 min and reached 9.1 km to the south of the volcano. The PDCs were mostly channelized by the Montegrande and San Antonio ravines, and produced a deposit with an estimated volume of 2.4 × 106 m3. Nearly 16 h after the first collapse, a second and larger collapse occurred which lasted 1 h 47 min. This second collapse produced a series of PDCs along the same ravines, reaching a distance of 10.3 km. The total volume calculated for the PDCs of the second event is 8.0 × 106 m3. Including associated ashfall deposits, the two episodes produced a total of 14.2 × 106 m3 of fragmentary material. The collapses formed an amphitheater-shaped crater open towards the south. We propose that the dome collapse was triggered by arrival of gas-rich magma to the upper conduit, which then boiled-over and sustained the PDCs. A juvenile scoria sample selected from the second partial dome collapse contains hornblende, yet at an order of magnitude less abundant (0.2%) than that of 1913, and exhibits reaction rims, whereas the 1913 hornblende is unreacted. At present there is no compelling petrologic evidence for imminent end-cycle activity observed at Volcán de Colima.
<p>The Ventura Espiritu Santo Volcanic Field (VESVF) and the Sierra Chichinautzin (SCN) are two monogenetic volcanic fields originated in different tectonic environments in the central portion of Mexico (continental rift and subduction). The VESVF is located 35 km NE of the city of San Luis Potos&#237; in the south of the Basin and Range extensional province. This volcanic field was formed by the eruption of alkaline magmas of mafic composition transporting mantle xenoliths described as spinel lherzolites and pyroxenites (Luhr et al., 1989; Aranda -G&#243;mez and Luhr, 1996). The SCN is a Quaternary volcanic field located in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) between two Quaternary arc-volcanoes (Popocatepetl and Nevado de Toluca[AR1]&#160;). Some authors believe that its origin has been related to the subduction of the Cocos plate beneath the North American plate (Marquez et al., 1999; Meriggi et al., 2008); however, the basalts present in the SCN are geochemically similar to OIBs.</p><p>New isotopic data of noble gases and CO<sub>2</sub> in fluid inclusions from the VESVF and SCN are presented in this work, since these two areas offer a great opportunity to study the local lithospheric mantle features and related processes (e.g., metasomatism, partial melting) occurring beneath Mexico. Twelve fresh xenoliths from the VESVF and two aliquots of olivine phenocrysts of andesites from SCN were selected. Based on the petrographic analysis, it was determined that the set of xenoliths exhibit same paragenesis: Ol> Opx>> Cpx> Spinel; all samples are plagioclase-free and are classified as spinel-lherzolites and harzburgites. Both the boundaries and the fractures of the crystals develop veins composed of yellowish glass and tiny crystals of carbonates. Lavas from SCVF were previously described as olivine andesites mainly aphanitic and porphyritic with few (<10%) phenocrysts of olivine and orthopyroxene (Marquez et al., 1999; Straub et al., 2011).</p><p>The mantle xenoliths and the olivine phenocrysts have comparable Rc/Ra values (where Rc/Ra is the <sup>3</sup>He/<sup>4</sup>He corrected for air contamination and normalized to air He). We find Rc/Ra compositions of 6.9-7.7 and 7.2-7.3, respectively, which are within the MORB-like upper-mantle range (Graham, 2002). The highest CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations are observed in olivine phenocrysts from SCN (9.2&#183;10<sup>-7</sup> mol/g and 1.3&#183;10<sup>-6</sup> mol/g), while the xenoliths cover a wide range of concentrations with values as high as 3.9&#183;10<sup>-7</sup> mol/g in Cpx. The isotopic composition of CO<sub>2</sub> (d<sup>13</sup>C vs PDB) in the olivine phenocrysts is around -6.2&#8240; with CO<sub>2</sub>/<sup>3</sup>He ratios of 3.3&#183;10<sup>9</sup>, which are comparable to MORB-like range (-8&#8240;<d<sup>13</sup>C<-4&#8240;); the mantle xenoliths in contrast, although displaying similar CO<sub>2</sub>/<sup>3</sup>He ratios (2.8&#183;10<sup>9</sup>), exhibit more positive d<sup>13</sup>C signature between -1.0 and -2.7%. We propose that these differences testify for isotopic heterogeneity in the mantle beneath the two areas, with and reflect mantle metasomatism underneath VESVF driven by interaction with carbonate rich-melts (likely consequence of carbonate recycling during the subduction process), as also evidenced by the petrographic analysis.</p>
LAMONT^DOHERTY EARTH OBSERVATORYAT THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, 61 ROUTE 9W, PALISADES, NY 10964, USA CENTRO DE GEOCIENCIAS, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTO¤ NOMA DE ME¤ XICO, QUERE¤ TARO 76230, ME¤ XICO INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCES, ACADEMIA SINICA, 128 ACADEMIA ROAD, SEC. 2, NANKANG, TAIPEI 11529, TAIWAN CENTRO NACIONAL DE PREVENCIO¤ N DE DESASTRES, SECRETARI¤ A DE GOBERNACIO¤ N, AV. DELFI¤ N MADRIGAL 665, COL. PEDREGAL DE SANTO DOMINGO, C.P. 04360, DELEGACIO¤ N COYOACA¤ N, ME¤ XICO D.F. 04510, MEXICO ISOTOPE GEOSCIENCES UNIT, SCOTTISH UNIVERSITIES RESEARCH AND REACTOR CENTRE, EAST KILBRIDE