Abstract The study of kimberlite rocks is important as they provide critical information regarding the composition and dynamics of the continental mantle and are the principal source of diamonds. Despite many decades of research, the original compositions of kimberlite melts, which are thought to be derived from depths > 150 km, remain highly debatable due to processes that can significantly modify their composition during ascent and emplacement. Snapshots of the kimberlite‐related melts were entrapped as secondary melt inclusions hosted in olivine from sheared peridotite xenoliths from the Udachnaya‐East pipe (Siberian craton). These xenoliths originated from 180‐ to 220‐km depth and are among the deepest derived samples of mantle rocks exposed at the surface. The crystallised melt inclusions contain diverse daughter mineral assemblages (>30 mineral species), which are dominated by alkali‐rich carbonates, sulfates, and chlorides. The presence of aragonite as a daughter mineral suggests a high‐pressure origin for these inclusions. Raman‐mapping studies of unexposed inclusions show that they are dominated by carbonates (>65 vol.%), whereas silicates are subordinate (<13 vol.%). This indicates that the parental melt for the inclusions was carbonatitic. The key chemical features of this melt are very high contents of alkalis, carbon dioxide, chlorine, and sulfur and extremely low silica and water. Alkali‐carbonate melts entrapped in xenolith minerals likely represent snapshots of the primitive kimberlite melt. This composition is in contrast with the generally accepted notion that kimberlites originated as ultramafic silicate water‐rich melts. Experimental studies revealed that alkali‐carbonate melts are a very suitable diamond‐forming media. Therefore, our findings support the idea that some diamonds and kimberlite magmatism may be genetically related.
Ultramafic-alkaline-carbonatite complexes (UACC), which are formed from mantle-derived carbonated alkali-ultramafic melts in large igneous provinces (LIPs), are important resources of Fe, Ti, U, Th, Nb, rare earth elements (REEs), Cu, Ni and platinum group elements (PGEs). Concentration of these metals and ore formation is assumed to be largely controlled by magmatic differentiation and post-magmatic hydrothermal processes. Although basic patterns of the metals' partitioning during formation of the UACCs are constrained by geochemical and mineralogical features of the rocks, including in experimental studies, our understanding of their pathway "from primitive melt to ore deposit" is far from complete. In order to further constrain the metals' behavior during differentiation of a carbonated alkali-ultramafic melt, we studied multiphase inclusions in olivine, chromite, perovskite, pyroxene and magnetite in the ultramafic rocks from three UACCs (Guli, Bor-Uryakh and Odikhincha), located in the Siberian LIP. Examination of both unheated and experimentally heated and quenched inclusions reveals a variety of compositions from melanephelinitic through to highly differentiated nephelinitic to alkali-rich carbonatitic. In addition, sulfide minerals, which turn into immiscible sulfide liquids during heating experiments, are widely distributed in the inclusions' assemblages. We consider these inclusions to be snapshots of intercumulus melts, which were entrained into olivine-rich cumulate mush, and use their compositions to delineate plutonic differentiation of a carbonated alkali-ultramafic melt. Highly differentiated silicate melts, entrapped in Fe-rich chromite (Guli dunites), were rich in U, Th and Nb and crystallized Os-Ir-Ru phases in proximity to the host chromite. Concentrations of U, Th, Nb and REEs in alkali-rich carbonatite liquids, which were present in the intercumulus of Odikhincha and Bor-Uryakh peridotites, approached levels similar to mineralized carbonatites and support the concentration of these metals in an immiscible alkali-carbonatite fraction, which was enriched in S, P and Cl. Minor sulfide liquids, which are closely associated with these carbonatite fractions, were strongly enriched in Cu and Ni, thus explaining the origin of the Phalaborwa-like sulfide ores in carbonatites as a result of magmatic differentiation. Finally, our study provides insights into the formation of peridotite-hosted types of mineralization (perovskite-magnetite ores, mineralized carbonatite veins and PGE-bearing chromitites) and shows that these ore-bearing assemblages can be formed due to the infiltration of the metal-bearing intercumulus melts through the ultramafic matrix.
The emplacement age of the Great Udzha Dyke (northern Siberian Craton) was determined by the U-Pb dating of apatite using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS). This produced an age of 1386 ± 30 Ma. This dyke along with two other adjacent intrusions, which cross-cut the sedimentary units of the Udzha paleo-rift, were subjected to paleomagnetic investigation. The paleomagnetic poles for the Udzha paleo-rift intrusions are consistent with previous results published for the Chieress dyke in the Anabar shield of the Siberian Craton (1384 ± 2 Ma). Our results suggest that there was a period of intense volcanism in the northern Siberian Craton, as well as allow us to reconstruct the apparent migration of the Siberian Craton during the Mesoproterozoic.
The petrologically unique Udachnaya-East kimberlite (Siberia, Russia) is characterised by unserpentinised and H2O-poor volcaniclastic and coherent units that contain fresh olivine, along with abundant alkali-rich carbonates, chlorides, sulphides and sulphates in the groundmass. These mineralogical and geochemical characteristics have led to two divergent models that advocate different origins. It has been suggested that the unserpentinised units from Udachnaya-East are representative of pristine unaltered kimberlite. Conversely, the alkali-chlorine-sulphur enrichment has been attributed to interactions with crustal materials and/or post-emplacement contamination by brines. The mineralogical and geochemical features and the compositions of melt inclusions in unserpentinised and serpentinised Udachnaya-East kimberlite varieties are compared in this study. Both varieties of kimberlite have similar major, compatible and incompatible trace element concentrations and primitive mantle normalised trace element patterns, groundmass textures and silicate, oxide and sulphide mineral compositions. However, these two kimberlite varieties are distinguished by: (i) the presence of unaltered olivine, abundant Na–K–Cl–S-rich minerals (i.e. chlorides, S-bearing alkali-carbonates, sodalite) and the absence of H2O-rich phases (i.e. serpentine, iowaite (Mg4Fe3+(OH)8OCl•3(H2O)) in unserpentinised samples, and (ii) the absence of alkali- and chlorine-enriched phases in the groundmass and characteristic olivine alteration (i.e. replacement by serpentine and/or iowaite) in serpentinised samples. In addition, melt inclusions hosted in olivine, monticellite, spinel and perovskite from unserpentinised and serpentinised kimberlite contain identical daughter phase assemblages that are dominated by alkali-carbonates, chlorides and sulphates/sulphides. This enrichment in alkalis, chlorine and sulphur in melt inclusions demonstrates that these elements were an intrinsic part of the parental magma. The paucity of alkali-carbonates and chlorides in the groundmass of serpentinised Udachnaya-East kimberlite is attributed to their instability and removal during post-emplacement alteration. All evidence previously used in support of crustal and brine contamination of the Udachnaya-East kimberlite is thoroughly evaluated. We demonstrate that 'contamination models' are inconsistent with petrographic, geochemical and melt inclusion data. Our combined data suggest that the Udachnaya-East kimberlite crystallised from an essentially H2O-poor, Si–Na–K–Cl–S-bearing carbonate-rich melt.
