Abstract Gunung Paku near Klian Intan, Perak, is a primary tin deposit in Malaysia mined since 200 years ago, contributing 3–5% of tin ore concentrates previously, and recently over 70% of the Malaysian tin. Gunung Paku is located within the western Tin belt of Peninsular Malaysia associated with biotite granite (184–230 Ma) of the Main Range Granitoid which extends up to the southern part of Peninsular and Central Thailand. The primary tin mineralization style at the Gunung Paku is mainly associated with widespread occurrence of sheet‐like quartz veining systems parallel to the strike of the host rocks and confined within a narrow N–S trending fault zone. The mineralization formed within a thick sequence of metasedimentry rock that belongs to the Baling Formation of Palaeozoic age. The host rock of weakly metamorphosed argillite generally experienced strong tropical weathering that resulted in a thick sequence of light grey to light brown oxidized profile. The mineralized veins range from simple quartz‐cassiterite, quartz‐tourmaline‐cassiterite to complex quartz‐cassiterite‐polymetallic sulfide veins. Wall rock alterations at Gunung Paku are mainly characterized by the hypogene type alteration consisting of silicification, tourmalinization, chloritization, sericitization and kaolinization normally adjacent to mineralized quartz veins and brecciated‐fault gouge zones. Pyrite, arsenopyrite, cassiterite, rutile, chalcopyrite, trippkeite (CuAsO4), scorodite, covellite and other secondary iron‐oxyhydroxide are the common metallic minerals that accompanied the tin mineralization. Other minor occurrences include trace amounts of complex lead‐bismuth‐antimony‐molybdenum bearing minerals.
Abstract The Penjom gold deposit lies on the eastern side of the Raub‐Bentong Suture line within the Central Belt of Permo‐Triassic rocks, near Kuala Lipis, Pahang, Malaysia. The geology of the deposit is dominated by a sequence of fine‐ to coarse‐grained rhyolitic to rhyodacitic tuff, tuff‐breccia and a minor rhyolitic–rhyodacitic volcanic series, associated with argillaceous marine sedimentary rocks consisting of shale with subordinate shalely limestone of Padang Tungku Formation and Pahang Volcanic Series. Fine‐ to coarse‐grained tonalite and quartz porphyry intruded this unit. The main structural features of the area are north–south‐trending left‐lateral strike‐slip faults and their subsidiaries, which generally strike north–south and dip moderately to the east (350°–360°/40°–60°). Mineralization at the Penjom gold deposit is structurally controlled and also erratic laterally and vertically. The gold mineralization can be categorized as (i) gold associated with carbonate‐rich zones hosted within dilated quartz veins carrying significant amount of sulfides; (ii) gold disseminated within stockwork of quartz–carbonate veins affiliated with tonalite; and (iii) gold often associated with arsenopyrite and pyrite in quartz–carbonate veins and stringers hosted within shear zones of brittle–ductile nature in all rock types and in brittle fractured rhyodacitic volcanic rocks. Sphalerite, chalcopyrite, tetrahedrite and pyrrhotite are the minerals accompanying the early stage of gold mineralization. These minerals also suffered from local brittle deformation. However, most of the gold mineralization took place after the deposition of these sulfides. Galena appears somewhat towards the end of gold mineralization, whereas tellurium and bismuth accompanied gold contemporaneously. The gold mineralization occurred most probably due to the metamorphogenic deformational origin concentrated mostly in the shear zone. The mineralization is strongly controlled by the wall rock (e.g. graphitic shale), the sulfide minerals and fluid–rock interaction.
This research demonstrates an effective procedure for assessing the impact of ore-controlling factors of orogenic gold. In this paper, ore genesis factors such as heat source, migration pathways and depositional environment were investigated. The procedure subsequently applied the weight of evidence model to weigh and quantify the spatial relationship between the control factors and 30 known gold deposits in Kelantan, Malaysia. The results show a strong correlation pattern between the deposits and the considered factors such as the NE-SW faults, the intrusive rocks and the sedimentary rocks. The NW-SE fault shows a weak correlation pattern with the deposits.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='translate(0 -400)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='translate(0 -600)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='translate(0 -800)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='translate(0 -1000)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='translate(0 -1200)'/%3e%3cpath d='M0 0h1400v800H0z' style='fill:%23010066'/%3e%3cpath d='M576 100c-166.146 0-301 134.406-301 300s134.854 300 301 300c60.027 0 115.955-17.564 162.927-47.783-27.353 9.44-56.71 14.602-87.271 14.602-147.327 0-266.897-119.172-266.897-266.01 0-146.837 119.57-266.01 266.897-266.01 32.558 0 63.746 5.815 92.602 16.468C696.217 118.91 638.305 100 576 100z' style='fill:%23fc0'/%3e%3cpath d='m914.286 471.429-99.538-53.25 29.43 108.982-66.575-91.165-20.77 110.96-20.428-111.024-66.857 90.96L699.314 418l-99.701 52.943 74.065-85.192-112.8 4.441 103.694-44.62-103.555-44.94L673.8 305.42 600 220l99.538 53.25-29.43-108.982 66.575 91.165 20.77-110.96 20.428 111.023 66.857-90.959L814.97 273.43l99.702-52.944-74.065 85.193 112.8-4.441-103.694 44.62 103.555 44.94-112.785-4.79z' style='fill:%23fc0' transform='matrix(1.2738 0 0 1.2423 -89.443 -29.478)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
