The year 2020 marked the 200th anniversary of European settlers first encountering the ‘noble expanse of water’ of Lake George in New South Wales. Since 1820, unofficial observations and official measurements of the lake’s water-level have been recorded almost continuously by various individuals, research teams, government departments and private companies. The lake’s recent hydrographic history has been characterised by periods of flood and drought, which correspond with the prevailing climate conditions of SE Australia. This is the longest water-level record of its sort in the Southern Hemisphere and hence of great scientific and historic value. Here, we have compiled all available historic water-level data for Lake George, referenced them to common datums and presented a methodology for continuing the record using satellite imagery in lieu of on-site measurements. KEY POINTSThe 200-year water-level record of Lake George, NSW has been compiled and referenced to a common datum.This is the longest record of its type in the South Hemisphere, documenting the modern periods of flood and drought in southeastern Australia.Water levels for the period 1986–2019 when no on-site measurements were recorded have been estimated using satellite imagery and the lake’s bathymetry.
Groundwater and surface water are hydraulically connected in many landscapes, and a better understanding of their connectivity is critical for effective management of water resources. Environmental tracers are a useful preliminary tool to study the interaction between groundwater and surface water and provide independent means for corroborating or refuting information based on more traditional investigations. This paper discusses the results of using major ions, stable isotopes (deuterium and oxygen-18) and a radioactive isotope (radon-222) as environmental tracers to better understand groundwater–surface water interactions in the Border Rivers catchment, Australia. In the upstream reaches of the catchment, shallow groundwater close to the river has a similar major-ion and stable-isotope chemistry to that of the river water, and is different to the groundwater distant from the river. The near-stream groundwater has an enriched isotopic signature (less negative) whereas groundwater far from the river has a depleted isotopic signature. Overall, the comparison of chloride concentrations with deuterium suggests that three types of groundwater occur in the Border Rivers catchment: (i) the near-stream groundwaters influenced by direct recharge from the river; (ii) the groundwaters marginal to the river that are more influenced by diffuse rainfall recharge; and (iii) saline groundwaters in the downstream part of the catchment which never (or rarely) receive recharge from surface water. River water samples obtained during the high-flow season show a very low variation in radon concentrations (0.11–0.39 Bq/L). The longitudinal transect of radon concentration measurements in river water during the high-flow season indicates that there is no groundwater contribution to stream flow. Radon concentrations are lower in groundwater close to the rivers and increase with distance from the river, in general coincidence with the salinity and chloride concentration. This indicates river water infiltration into nearby alluvial aquifers, rather than groundwater discharge to the river. The results of hydrochemical and environmental isotope sampling indicate that in the upper catchment area (upstream of Keetah) the river is connected to and actively recharges the near-stream shallow alluvial aquifer. Using the environmental isotope data, we have also demonstrated that recharge of the alluvial aquifers by surface water occurs by bank infiltration, with diffuse recharge during high-rainfall events more dominant further away from the river. This information would be useful for a better understanding of the nature and extent of hydrogeological processes at the river–aquifer interface and their links with biogeochemical processes and ultimately water allocation policies.
Abstract Many important water issues such as over-allocation, stream salinity and environmental flows are influenced by the interaction between rivers and underlying aquifers. There are many indirect ways of estimating this flux (such as using hydrographs, tracers or geophysics) but the most common direct method is the use of seepage meters. Over recent decades, various modifications have been made to the basic seepage meter to address potential sources of measurement error and to handle operational issues. These aim to reduce the impact of factors such as upward advection of interstitial water (the Bernoulli effect), venturi effects of stream flow on the collection bag, anomalous short-term influx due to bag properties, gas accumulation in the chamber, frictional resistance causing head losses, ineffective seals and capture of shallow throughflow (rather than groundwater). We have attempted to incorporate these improvements in our seepage meter design and development of simple field procedures, which were trialled in two contrasting catchments (Border Rivers and Lower Richmond) in Australia. The field trials had mixed success, highlighting the potential for spurious seepage flux measurements due to these operational issues. Key Words: groundwater flowseepage fluxseepage meterstream–aquifer connectivity Acknowledgements The seepage meter described in this paper was developed as part of the Managing Connected Water Resources Project, focusing on conjunctive water management. This project was collaborative between the Bureau of Rural Sciences, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, the Australian National University, New South Wales Department of Natural Resources and Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water. Funding was provided by the Natural Heritage Trust, the National Landcare Programme and the Australian Research Council, as well as the project partners.