Abstract. Near-surface air temperature (Ta) is a key variable in global climate studies. A global gridded dataset of daily maximum and minimum Ta (Tmax and Tmin) is particularly valuable and critically needed in the scientific and policy communities but is still not available. In this paper, we developed a global dataset of daily Tmax and Tmin at 1 km resolution over land across 50∘ S–79∘ N from 2003 to 2020 through the combined use of ground-station-based Ta measurements and satellite observations (i.e., digital elevation model and land surface temperature) via a state-of-the-art statistical method named Spatially Varying Coefficient Models with Sign Preservation (SVCM-SP). The root mean square errors in our estimates ranged from 1.20 to 2.44 ∘C for Tmax and 1.69 to 2.39 ∘C for Tmin. We found that the accuracies were affected primarily by land cover types, elevation ranges, and climate backgrounds. Our dataset correctly represents a negative relationship between Ta and elevation and a positive relationship between Ta and land surface temperature; it captured spatial and temporal patterns of Ta realistically. This global 1 km gridded daily Tmax and Tmin dataset is the first of its kind, and we expect it to be of great value to global studies such as the urban heat island phenomenon, hydrological modeling, and epidemic forecasting. The data have been published by Iowa State University at https://doi.org/10.25380/iastate.c.6005185 (Zhang and Zhou, 2022).
By altering fluxes of heat, momentum, and moisture exchanges between the land surface and atmosphere, forestry and other land-use activities affect climate. Although long recognized scientifically as being important, these so-called biogeophysical forcings are rarely included in climate policies for forestry and other land management projects due to the many challenges associated with their quantification. Here, we review the scientific literature in the fields of atmospheric science and terrestrial ecology in light of three main objectives: (i) to elucidate the challenges associated with quantifying biogeophysical climate forcings connected to land use and land management, with a focus on the forestry sector; (ii) to identify and describe scientific approaches and/or metrics facilitating the quantification and interpretation of direct biogeophysical climate forcings; and (iii) to identify and recommend research priorities that can help overcome the challenges of their attribution to specific land-use activities, bridging the knowledge gap between the climate modeling, forest ecology, and resource management communities. We find that ignoring surface biogeophysics may mislead climate mitigation policies, yet existing metrics are unlikely to be sufficient. Successful metrics ought to (i) include both radiative and nonradiative climate forcings; (ii) reconcile disparities between biogeophysical and biogeochemical forcings, and (iii) acknowledge trade-offs between global and local climate benefits. We call for more coordinated research among terrestrial ecologists, resource managers, and coupled climate modelers to harmonize datasets, refine analytical techniques, and corroborate and validate metrics that are more amenable to analyses at the scale of an individual site or region.
Abstract Grain size assessments are necessary for understanding the various geomorphological, hydrological and ecological processes that occur within rivers. Recent research has shown that the application of Structure‐from‐Motion (SfM) photogrammetry to imagery from uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) shows promise for rapidly characterising grain sizes along rivers in comparison to traditional field‐based methods. Here, we evaluated the applicability of different methods for estimating grain sizes in gravel bars along a study reach in the Olentangy River in Columbus, Ohio. We collected imagery of these gravel bars with a UAV and processed those images with SfM photogrammetry software to produce three‐dimensional point clouds and orthomosaics. Our evaluation compared statistical models calibrated on topographic roughness, which was computed from the point clouds, and to those based on image texture, which was computed from the orthomosaics. Our results showed that statistical models calibrated on image texture were more accurate than those based on topographic roughness. This might be because of site‐specific patterns of grain size, shape and imbrication. Such patterns would have complicated the detection of topographic signatures associated with individual grains. Our work illustrates that UAV‐SfM approaches show potential to be used as an accessible method for characterising surface grain sizes along rivers at higher spatial and temporal resolutions than those provided by traditional methods.
Geographically weighted regression (GWR) extends the conventional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression technique by considering spatial nonstationarity in variable relationships and allowing the use of spatially varying coefficients in linear models. Previous forest studies have demonstrated the better performance of GWR compared to OLS when calibrated and validated at sampled locations where field measurements are collected. However, the use of GWR for remote-sensing applications requires generating estimates and evaluating the model performance for the large image scene, not just for sampled locations. In this study, we introduce GWR to estimate forest canopy height using high spatial resolution Quickbird (QB) imagery and evaluate the influence of sampling density on GWR. We also examine four commonly used spatial analysis techniques – OLS, inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK) and cokriging (COK) – and compare their performance with that using GWR. Results show that (i) GWR outperformed OLS at all sampling densities; however, they produced similar results at low sampling densities, suggesting that GWR may not produce significantly better results than OLS in remote-sensing operational applications where only a small number of field data are collected. (ii) The performance of GWR was better than those of IDW, OK and COK at most sampling densities. Among the spatial interpolation techniques we examined, IDW was the best to estimate the canopy height at most densities, while COK outperformed OK only marginally and produced larger canopy height estimation errors than both IDW and GWR. (iii) GWR had the advantage of generating canopy height estimation maps with more accurate estimates than OLS, and it preserved patterns of geographic features better than IDW, OK or COK.
Accurate estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) for maize canopies are important for maize growth monitoring and yield estimation. The goal of this study is to explore the potential of using airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral data to better estimate maize fPAR. This study focuses on estimating maize fPAR from (1) height and coverage metrics derived from airborne LiDAR point cloud data; (2) vegetation indices derived from hyperspectral imagery; and (3) a combination of these metrics. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationships among LiDAR metrics, hyperspectral metrics, and field-measured fPAR values. Then, multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed using these metrics. Results showed that (1) LiDAR height and coverage metrics provided good explanatory power (i.e., R2 = 0.81); (2) hyperspectral vegetation indices provided moderate interpretability (i.e., R2 = 0.50); and (3) the combination of LiDAR metrics and hyperspectral metrics improved the LiDAR model (i.e., R2 = 0.88). These results indicate that LiDAR model seems to offer a reliable method for estimating maize fPAR at a high spatial resolution and it can be used for farmland management. Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics led to better performance of maize fPAR estimation than LiDAR or hyperspectral metrics alone, which means that maize fPAR retrieval can benefit from the complementary nature of LiDAR-detected canopy structure characteristics and hyperspectral-captured vegetation spectral information.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)